Eamon Gilmore: Profit more important than human rights?

Every country trading or hoping to trade with China has to achieve a balance between profit and defending human rights by highlighting China’s poor record in this area.

Most Western countries have made efforts to achieve this balance.

The French Prime Minister recently spoke out strongly during a visit to China.

US president Barak Obama also spoke directly to the Chinese and had an official make the following statement outside the Beijing courthouse where a human rights campaigner was being sentenced.

We call on the Government of China to release him immediately and to respect the rights of all China’s citizens to peacefully express their political views.

Many of these people are tortured and in one case the wife and children of a campaigner were starved for three days until he relented.

Amnesty International asked our Minister for Foreign Affairs, Eamon Gilmore, to specifically raise some of these cases with the Chinese Vice President on his recent visit.

Gilmore’s response:

No, we didn’t raise specific cases any more than we raised specific trade investments.

Trade investments, human torture? What’s the difference, what’s the big deal?

In fairness to Gilmore, he’s only reflecting the extremely low ethical/moral standards common throughout the Irish body politic.

Full report on RTEs Drivetime (20th Feb.).

Copy to:
Eamon Gilmore

Official regulation of legal profession needed

Letter in today’s Irish Examiner.

Official regulation of legal profession needed

The embezzlement of clients funds is becoming an all too familiar story among the legal profession.

A growing number of solicitors are being struck off annually for misconduct and fraud with substantial sums of money involved.

The scale of fraud in some cases has been astonishing and it is quite clear that many of those who run the justice system are behaving like hardened criminals, who flee the jurisdiction when they are found out.

Members of the legal profession are in very powerful positions as a result of their escrow services or any other financial activities which they may provide.

The risk to their clients is all too obvious and it is becoming clear that banking-type services are being practised by solicitors with no minimum safeguards against money held.

To date, the legal profession has been a self-regulating body. This is a situation that can no longer be tolerated, given the current ethics crisis within the profession.

Maurice Fitzgerald
Shanbally
Co Cork

Ann Marie Hourihane: Meandering and meaningless

I don’t think I’ve ever managed to read an article by Irish Times columnist Ann Marie Hourihane from beginning to end.

This is principally because, invariably, I find her musings to be meandering and meaningless.

Today, for some inexplicable reason, I did manage to read her entire article – and found it to be entirely meandering and meaningless.

Terry Prone sermon

Letter in today’s Irish Examiner.

Not all public servants are targets of hate

In her recent sermon-like article (Irish Examiner, Feb 6) Terry Prone castigated the Irish people for what she describes as their licensed envy and resentment against those perceived to be insulated against the current recession.

Ms Prone claims that anybody in the public service who takes home expenses of any kind is a target of public hatred.

This is untrue.

It is only those at the higher levels of the public service, including politicians, who pay themselves lottery sum salaries and pensions, that are rightly the target of public odium.

She claims that the media takes advantage of people’s resentment to get a headline.

This is untrue.

While the media has its faults it has done great service for the people of Ireland by exposing the corruption and incompetence that has destroyed the country.

Ms. Prone is critical of the Freedom of Information Act, suggesting that it costs more than it’s worth.

This is a disturbing attitude from someone who has such an influence in the media.

Assuming that Ms Prone is actually aware of the deep hardships being suffered by the majority of citizens is it reasonable to conclude that her hardline views stem from someone who is well insulated against such hardships?

Anthony Sheridan
Cobh
Co Cork

Religious dinosaur (Senator Hanafin) emerges from the undergrowth

Atheist Ireland has written to all members of the respective Committees on Procedure and Privilege of both the Dail and the Seanad requesting that the Oireachtas cease the practice of starting daily business with a prayer.

The letter quotes the opinion of Senator John Hanafin from 2007.

I welcome that we pray every morning in the Chamber before conducting our business. It allows us to renew our efforts to do our best and invoke God to assist us in our efforts.

I note societies that turned their back on God — fascist and communist — and relied solely on Man’s logic, rose and fell quickly.

Ok, I know that our body politic is full of representatives who are ignorant when it comes to history/philosophy but it’s rare enough these days to see such dinosaurs actually emerge from the undergrowth.

Is John Waters becoming an embarrassment to the Irish Times?

Catholic militant John Waters went a bit mad on Newstalk’s Sunday Show recently (12th Feb. 2nd part) during a discussion on the closure of the Irish embassy to the Vatican.

He returned to the issue in the Irish Times (17th Feb.) and was obviously still very angry at the evil conspiracy to do down his beloved Catholic Church.

The closure was, according to Waters:

An opportunistic act of neurotic bigotry by militant atheists seeking to impose their myopic beliefs on the rest of us.

Throwing in the usual stuff about an implacable media hostility towards the Catholic Church he tells us that the closure of the embassy is all part of a slithery agenda by the Labour Party.

This mad rant, of course, is par for the course for Waters as he continues his ever-quickening descent into the dark pit of religious fundamentalism.

The immediate (editorial) response from the editor of the Irish Times (Sat. 18th) was, however, surprising and, in my opinion, very welcome.

Here’s some of what he had to say:

Commentators have complained of a media culture that excludes or marginalises religious ideas, and even of the closure of the Vatican embassy as the product of a “militant atheist” Labour agenda.

The overblown rhetoric is almost comical, if not an insult to those who labour under real tyranny.

But is there a germ of truth? Are we really living in an age of liberal intolerance?

Hardly. In truth the reality of declining influence and deference – even within their own faith communities – is difficult to adjust to and accept.

Denial starts with blame. Shoot the messenger, the infernal media!

But amid the recriminations, compelling evidence of systematic media disparaging of religion has not been forthcoming.

I couldn’t agree more and I wonder if Waters is becoming an embarrassment to the Irish Times.

I wonder if the the editor is, perhaps, hinting that it’s time for him to move on.

Enday Kenny: Nothing free anymore (Except for politicians)

Enda Kenny was on the news the other day telling us that the €100 property tax was needed for street lighting, footpaths and libraries. He topped this dishonest argument by saying:

There’s nothing free in this world anymore.

This, of course, is not true either.

The annual top-up of almost €50,000 he received as leader of the Opposition was free and the €17,205 Jan O’Sullivan is pocketing on top of her minister’s salary of €130,042 is also free.

Rabbitte rabbiting on as the country goes down the tubes

Once again we see the greed and arrogance of politicians as they help themselves to even more money from the taxpayer’s pocket as the country goes down the tubes.

Minister for something or other, Pat Rabbitte, was not pleased when questioned about his Labour colleague Jan O’Sullivan pocketing an extra allowance of €17,205 per year on top of her minister’s salary of €130,042 (Morning Ireland, 2nd item).

In a barely tolerant voice at being asked such trivial questions Minister Rabbitte responded:

Well, sometimes our public debate has an unerring instinct for the peripheral. Jan O’Sullivan was promoted to Cabinet and has got the rate that goes with the job…

I mean if this is the level of discussion at a time when the country is virtually bankrupt as a result of the dysfunction of Fianna Fail I really find it very difficult to take it seriously.

When it was suggested that unwarranted expenses should be addressed the Minister became angry and did what all puffed up ministers do when they’re asked hard questions, he wandered off talking about something else.

Well are you suggesting that a tiny island nation that’s trying to trade with the rest of the world shouldn’t promote itself and promote the Taoiseach when he meets foreign leaders and tries to sell Ireland abroad?

I mean this has to be seen in perspective; government has to do its job to the best of its ability to sell this country…

It would be best if this kind of pernicious ad hominem, personal rumours by Sinn Fein were ignored and better that Fianna Fail be ignored given what they’ve done to the country.

Meanwhile, a very angry Pat Kenny, put the following question to Fine Gael TD, Mary Mitchell O’Connor regarding the government levy on personal pensions.

What is the moral basis for putting their hands in people’s pockets and stealing their money?

Pat, you know and I know that there’s no money in the country and we have to take extraordinary measures.

We’re depending on outside agencies, the IMF, EU and ECB to keep the country running.

Tell that to the so-called left wing socialists Rabbitte and O’Sullivan.

Witholding information to save embarrassment is always wrong

A recent report by the Garda Inspectorate found that up to 65% of child sexual offences examined in a sample of Garda records were not included in the official crime figures.

An excessively deferential approach and a reluctance to apply for search warrants to secure church records were suggested as contributory factors

Garda Commissioner Martin Callinan responded to the report by saying that the force had given ‘huge attention’ to improving its handling of child sexual abuse investigations.

This is the standard response when serious failures are revealed within the Garda, the political system, the church or the financial sector.

Mistakes were made in the past but now everything is rosy in the garden – until the next failure, the next scandal.

While the media is, by far, the most effective force in bringing state authorities to account there are occasions when sections of the media do get things wrong.

An Irish Times editorial in response to the Garda Inspectorate report tells us (My emphasis):

It is important to realise that this investigation was ordered in the aftermath of the Murphy report concerning clerical sex abuse in the Dublin archdiocese and it deals with criticisms of the Garda Síochána from 2009.

The report was delivered in 2010, as public anger over denials and cover-ups by the Catholic hierarchy overflowed and a fresh investigation was launched in the Cloyne diocese.

In the circumstances, withholding the document to avoid the Garda being caught up in public condemnations was understandable.

It is, of course, neither understandable nor acceptable that information should be withheld to save any state institution from being the subject of public odium.

The expression of public anger in response to state failures is a crucial element in a healthy democracy.

Copy to:
Irish Times

John Waters: Blind to the brutal reality of white-collar corruption in Ireland

Recently, Irish Times columnist, John Waters, did a really, really, stupid thing.

Writing in the Irish Mail on Sunday (January 22) Mr. Waters describes how he was browsing the Web when he was confronted with a pop-up competition, which, he writes ‘I was impelled to engage with’.

After clicking on a proffered answer to a quiz question Waters was invited to submit his mobile phone number which, and this is where the stupidity comes in, he did.

Immediately Waters was sucked into the murky, unregulated underworld of mobile phone rip-offs that ultimately cost him up to €200.

Now it might be argued that this could happen to anybody, indeed, it obviously happens to lots of people which is why most, if not all, phone companies are engaged in these sleazy practices.

But waters was doubly stupid because five years previously his daughter was the victim of a very similar rip-off.

She had texted her number to a TV advert which allowed criminals (Waters’ word) to steal over €150 from her account.

Waters eventually managed to get his daughters money refunded but only after a great deal of hassle and stress dealing with organisations like the offending phone company, Comreg, Regtel and the Department of Communications.

Here’s how he described the situation:

I discovered that this practice was widespread. So-called ‘premium-rater’ telephone companies were seemingly able to take money from someone’s mobile phone account with total impunity, even though no service had ever been requested and none supplied.

On top of this stupidity Waters goes on (unwittingly) to admit that he is extremely naïve and disturbingly ignorant (especially for a journalist) when it comes to his knowledge of how things are done in the (corrupt) state of Ireland.

Apparently Waters is one of those people who labour under the delusion that Irish regulators are there to serve the interests of the people, to make sure that citizens are protected against the ruthless activities of white-collar criminals.

On the off chance that Mr. Waters may at some point read this article I feel impelled to spell out the brutal reality.

So-called regulators, at best, consist of comfortable freeloaders, almost always appointed by politicians, who are expert only in drawing down their lottery sum salaries and expenses while regurgitating the same glossy annual report, which invariably paints a picture of absolute happiness across the land.

They exist for only one reason – to create the pretence that Ireland is a functional, well-regulated democracy.

These so-called regulators have just two priorities.

To do as their political masters instruct and to become expert in waffling to the general public about the great job they’re doing.

At worst, so-called regulators actively work to protect and indeed facilitate white- collar criminals no matter what the crime, no matter how much damage is inflicted on Ireland and its people.

How can I make such a statement with such confidence? Simple, I just look at the record, over, say the last thirty years, of endemic white-collar crime.

How many so-called regulators have independently uncovered white-collar crime in the last thirty years – None.

How many prosecutions have been taken by so-called regulators against white-collar criminals in the last thirty years – Very, very few.

How many white-collar criminals have been jailed in the last thirty years – Very, very few.

How many major white-collar criminals have been prosecuted and/or jailed over the last thirty years – None, absolutely none.

The most disturbing aspect of Mr. Waters’ article is his total ignorance of the depth of corruption in Ireland. The headline on his article reads:

Since when is larceny not just legal but admirable?

I can answer that question very precisely.

Larceny of the white-collar variety became legal and admired in December 1979 when John Waters’ hero, the criminal politician Haughey, came to power.

It was at that ignominious moment that Ireland and its people began the catastrophic slide into poverty and loss of sovereignty, a situation that will destroy the lives of Irish citizens for generations to come.

It is a genuine tragedy for Ireland that influential people like Mr. Waters are unable or are unwilling to accept the brutal reality that Ireland is an intrinsically corrupt state.

It is worth quoting the final few chapters of Mr. Waters’ article because it sums up his ignorance of the reality that our political system is corrupt and that the rotten system has spread the disease of corruption throughout all levels of Irish society.

It is as though many people now take it as read that Ireland has become a paradise for shysters and robbers.

I must have dropped off for a few years because I have no memory of this dramatic shift in Irish culture being discussed and ushered in.

Mr. Waters is admitting that he has no memory of the very serious political and financial white-collar crime that has been endemic over the last thirty years.

I still had these old-fashioned notions that stealing was illegal and even conceivably wrong and that the State had a responsibility to protect its citizens from crooks. Silly me.

Yes Mr. Waters, silly you.

Copy to:
John Waters