Garda officer gets to the truth of the matter

The following quote was emailed to the Pat Kenny Show yesterday by a garda.

The email gets right to the core of the most recent Garda/political scandal – The corrupt connection between the Gardai and the political system.

A comment made yesterday that the misbehaviour in the Gardai possibly being done by rogue elements within the force. Since all of this scandal is down to senior management, the altering of crime figures, the wiping of penalty points, the granting of bail, the threatening of whistleblowers I think it’s ironically hilarious that the rogue element within the job is actually its own management. Since all promotions above the rank of inspector are political maybe future governments will be a bit more careful as to who they promote.

Noel Dempsey finally experiences a glimmer of a democratic principle – too late

I see former Fianna Fail politician Noel Dempsey now believes that clientelism should be reduced.

If you are a national representative, you should not be trying to solve everybody’s individual’s problems.

Isn’t it amazing how, once our traitorous politicians have pocketed their massive payoffs and secured their big fat pensions, they suddenly become enlightened with all kinds of ideas like accountability, transparency and democracy?

But always, alas, too late to actually do anything useful for their country.

Paul Williams: A pathetic toady for Shatter and Callinan

In a previous article I wondered whether Irish Independent journalist Paul Williams was an uninformed novice or a heavily biased journalist writing with a particular agenda.

I suspected he was biased but in a subsequent article Williams has not only revealed his extreme bias but also his thin skin when anybody dares to challenge his very questionable journalism.

In what can only be described as a childish rant Williams reveals himself as an overly sensitive amateur when it comes to covering stories outside his comfort zone.

Instead of responding in a professional manner to journalists who strongly criticised his latest theory on the bugging scandal Williams headed for the gutter in search of sewage to throw at his perceived enemies.

Claiming he was attacked by a ‘marauding group’ of journalists barely out of college, liberal commentators, social media commentators and Sinn Fein Williams abandoned any trace of professionalism he may have possessed.

He was also strongly critical of RTEs ‘politically correct pundits’ but didn’t have the courage to actually name those he condemned.

Crying onto his keyboard he claimed he was being victimised for refusing to accept the wisdom of the ‘media mob’.

But Williams really confirmed his status as a gutter journalist when he resorted to a smear that I haven’t seen used in this country for many years.

Here, in his own words:

It was astonishing to watch as this marauding group swooped to defend a UK security company – some of whose employees are former agents of the dreaded crown – that was used by GSOC.

This crude attempt to stir up anti-British sentiment, particularly as Williams would be well aware that GSOC chairman Simon O’Brien is a UK citizen, is disgusting in the extreme.

This excuse for a journalist claims that his job in life is to put facts on paper and let the public make up their own minds.

In reality, he’s nothing but a pathetic toady for Shatter and Callinan.

Paul Williams: Biased in favour of Garda Commissioner and Minister for Justice?

Irish Independent journalist Paul Williams is an expert when reporting on crime.

He’s also a very courageous journalist, a man who has put his life on the line in his determination to expose those who operate in the murky criminal underworld.

It is clear, however, that when it comes to matters outside of his expertise Mr. Williams is either an uninformed novice or is a heavily biased journalist who writes with a particular agenda.

A recent article by him on the GSOC scandal makes the point.

Williams first claims that there was an unfair inference that ‘shadowy renegades’ within the Gardai were to blame.

Any informed, objective observer would immediately see that the Gardai, whether shadowy or official, were indeed the likely suspects.

It is standard police practice the world over to first focus on the most obvious suspects of a crime before considering other leads.

The Gardai are, without a shadow of doubt, the chief suspects in this case.

He next claims, and he clearly sees this as outrageous, that GSOCs decision not to alert Justice Minister Shatter of the bugging infers that they don’t trust him.

And that is effectively an insult to Shatter, who even his most vocal critics agree, is a man of unflinching integrity.

Objective journalists do not make such unambiguously supportive claims in favour of individuals, and particularly politicians, who are involved in serious controversy.

As for Shatter’s so-called integrity?

I don’t believe that a politician who effectively bullies a police officer when asked to provide a breath test is a man of integrity.

I don’t believe that a politician who attacks Garda whistleblowers who are courageously seeking justice and accountability is a man of integrity.

I don’t believe that a politician who uses confidential police information to attack a fellow politician is a man of integrity.

As part of his argument in support of the Gardai and Minister Williams quotes the Taoiseach’s (completely mistaken) claim that GSOC had a legal obligation to report the matter to the Justice Minister.

An objective journalist would have done his research by having a quick look at the easily accessible legislation.

Williams then goes on to claim that serious criminals and terrorists would be interested in bugging GSOC.

Not even the Garda Commissioner nor Shatter, both of whom are desperately struggling to put this scandal behind them, are prepared to make such a silly claim.

As I said at the beginning Mr. Williams seems to be either an uninformed novice or is heavily biased in favour of the Garda Commissioner and the Minister for Justice.

Given Mr. Williams’ long and close connections with the Gardai I suspect the latter is the case.

Copy to:
Paul Williams

Michael Noonan: As ruthless and callous as ever

When he was Minister for Health in the 1990s Michael Noonan and his bureaucratic minions hounded Bridget McCole, even on her deathbed, to stop her fight for justice against a state which had poisoned and eventually killed her.

Because she was dying Bridget McCole caved into threats and bullying and accepted a measly £175,000 compensation from the state. She only accepted the money so that her family would have something after she died.

Michael Noonan’s behaviour throughout was ruthless and callous. Later, and probably when he realised that his disgusting behaviour might cost him votes, he apologised.

Ok, it might be argued by some that Noonan made a mistake, that he realised how ruthless he had been and had learned his lesson. They might argue that having learned the lesson he would never again treat those who came under his power in such a callous manner.

Wrong. Noonan is still as ruthless, still as callous as ever.

He and his bureaucratic minions are are in the process to throwing thousands of desperate mortgage holders to a pack of foreign vulture capitalists.

This callous individual say he ‘expects’ any buyer of mortgages to comply with Central Bank codes of conduct. This is dishonest bullshit as it is expected that most, if not all of the vulture capitalists will not come within the remit of the Central Bank.

The Central Bank, mealy mouthed and spineless as ever, said they were ‘concerned’ and expressed a ‘preference’ for compliance with the code.

So here’s what’s likely to happen. Most of the 13,000 mortgages will be snapped up by the vultures. Feeding frenzy will commence and the mortgage holders will be stripped to the bone.

The victims will be left with little or nothing, with no hope for the future. They are strictly forbidden to bid for their own homes unless they can come up with the full amount due.

Remember 13,000 mortgages translates into multiple thousands of humans who are likely to be seriously damaged by Noonan’s ruthless strategy.

The vast majority of Noonan’s victims are likely to suffer trauma that will remain with them for the rest of their lives. Given the shock that’s about to be delivered to many of them it is quite likely that at least some will be pushed over the final edge.

But does a ruthless individual like Noonan, who first showed his true colours when he hounded Bridget McCole on her deathbed, care?

Like fuck he does.

Copy to:

Noonan
Central Bank

Sensational news: The truth about the GSOC bugging scandal

As always in Ireland when a scandal like the GSOC bugging allegations breaks the entire event is overwhelmed with talk, talk, talk, talk…..

Who’s responsible? Who would have the expertise and equipment? Why didn’t GSOC report the matter to the Minister? Why have I a pain in my arse……?

Here’s the truth for anyone who’s interested.

Hey, look over there, a duck.

A duck, are you sure?

Well, It’s walking like a duck.

But it could be an elephant walking like a duck.

No, now it’s in the pond and swimming like a duck.

Now, now, we have to be very careful here. We can’t be jumping to conclusions, can’t be making wild allegations.

Hold on, it’s quacking like a duck.

Feck, it must be a duck after all, now what are we going to do?

Shoot it, of course, and hide the body. We can’t have anybody else knowing the truth.

Senate: Back to (ab)normal

Letter in today’s Irish Times.

Reforming the Seanad

Sir,

Thomas O’Connor assures us that “the people will appease their appetite for change at next year’s local and European elections” (January 7th).

I would not hold my breath if I were him. When given an opportunity to get rid of the expensive talking shop for the elite called the Seanad they turned it down.

That has continued a debate on the Seanad that gets more removed from reality by the day. First we have high-profile people, who supported its retention during the referendum, opposing the “reforms” that were part of the retention campaign.

Then we had a Government Minister, who supported the campaign to abolish it, proposing “reform” of an institution that during the campaign was “irreformable”.

Since it just means electing another Dáil, dominated by the same political parties, the widely canvassed election of Seanad members by universal suffrage does not constitute reform.

The choice for “reform” of the Seanad boils down, therefore, to two options. Turn it into another Dáil or leave it as an expensive, powerless talking shop for the elite and their cronies.

Yours, etc,

Anthony Leavy
Dublin

First letter and still angry

From the Attic Archives.

This letter was my first letter to be published (Irish Times June 23 1987).

Sir,

I wish to express my strong objection to replies given to Professor John A Murphy by the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr. Brian Lenihan, regarding the misuse of public funds during the recent SEA referendum. (The Irish Times, Senate report, June 4).

Because I voted ‘NO’ it would appear that I am an ‘unreasonable person’ for which the Government leant over backwards to ‘allow’ me to express an opinion ‘blatantly against the national interest’.

What, I wonder will happen to unreasonable people in the future should the Government decide not to lean over backwards to ‘allow’ expression of opinion, in the national interest, of course?

Concentration camps, perhaps?

Anthony Sheridan

Straight-talking Irish politician?

Is the following straight-talking quote from the mouth of an Irish politician or a politician from an accountable, democratic state?

One million for the correct answer.

I take this action today because it’s my job. I am responsible for what happened. I am sad to report to the people that we fell short; we fell short of the expectations that we’ve created over the last four years for the type of excellence in government that they should expect.