Fergal Keane: Completely blind to the brutal reality of how Ireland is (mis) governed

In my previous article I wrote about RTE journalist Fergal Keane’s view that Ireland’s history of political violence was one factor that has prevented Irish citizens from taking to the streets in response to the economic collapse.

Here, in his own words, is his second reason for the docility of Irish citizens in the face of economic catastrophe.

There’s a collective sense of guilt. Everybody sinned in one-way or another. People took out too many loans; they bought stuff they shouldn’t have bought. Everybody felt responsible for it so we all took responsibility for it.

This simplistic, preachy and uninformed view is downright insulting to Irish citizens.

The vast majority of citizens did not sin, did not take out too many loans; did not buy stuff they should not have.

But even if some people did make bad decisions does that mean they were responsible, as Keane suggests, for the catastrophe?

Does he seriously believe that the individual actions of ordinary citizens were responsible for the loss of our economic sovereignty?

Does he really believe that Irish citizens then decided, en masse, that they were to blame and that they should therefore quietly knuckle down and take due punishment for their ‘sins’?

Disturbingly, it seems Keane does believe the above. It seems that, in common with far too many journalists, he is completely blind to the brutal reality of how Ireland is (mis) governed.

So here, for his enlightenment, is the brutal truth.

Broadly speaking there are just two classes of citizen in Ireland, those with power and influence and those with no power whatsoever.

These classes operate within what is laughingly called Irish democracy.

Those without power constitute the great majority of citizens, the great unwashed.

Those with power constitute the professional classes, the business sector, senior civil servants (particularly those working in the so-called law enforcement sector), union leaders, sections of the media and the body politic.

It is very important to understand that the body politic is, essentially, a single class that supports and defends its culture of clientelism, gombeenism and corruption.

All Irish politicians, on entering the political class must abandon all scruples and principles they may have in order to remain members.

This cynical abandonment of principles has become an open and fully accepted aspect of Irish political culture.

Those very few with the courage to challenge the corrupt system are immediately and ruthlessly ejected from its ranks in case any smidgeon of principle should infect the culture of greed, arrogance and corruption.

Nessa Childers and Roisin Shortall are recent examples of what happens to politicians who break the unwritten laws of the ruling political elite.

The electorate is the fodder for this political class. They have just two useful functions – to vote the gombeens into office/power and hand over their hard earned money to pay for the incompetence, arrogance and corruption of their political abusers.

Unlike functional democracies, there is, in effect, no opposition in Ireland. Parties or groups of parties simply take turns in exercising and abusing power.

Those waiting in the wings for their turn at the feeding trough of public money produce an endless stream of mealy-mouthed bullshit that’s supposed to resemble the democratic process.

And why, it may be asked, do the Irish electorate put up with this rotten system, why did they not take to the streets as a united group to bring down the corrupt system that continues to do so much damage to their interests?

Political ignorance is the answer.

Irish citizens, after decades of living under the corrupt system of clientelism, have little idea of what real democracy means.

In a sentence, the majority of Irish citizens believe that power emanates downwards from the gombeens they elected in exchange for a few favours paid for by their own tax money.

In functional democracies the electorate are very much aware that it is the ordinary people who own power; that power emanates from the bottom up.

They rightly treat those elected to political office as little more than ordinary citizens who have been temporarily granted power to run the state.

Add a complete absence of courageous and visionary political leadership to a largely politically ignorant electorate and you have the Ireland of today:

A nation of increasingly desperate and extremely angry people who are crying out for a leader to introduce them, for the first time in their history, to real democracy.

Copy to:
Fergal Keane
All political parties

Fergal Keane: Living in a bubble of denial

RTE journalist Fergal Keane ‘enlightened’ the nation as to why Irish people did not resort to rioting in response to the economic collapse (Drivetime, 13 Dec.).

He gave two reasons:

One: Irish people know the consequences of political violence; we’ve lived with it for 40 years or more.

Two: A collective sense of guilt. Everybody sinned in one-way or another. People took out too many loans; they bought stuff they shouldn’t have bought. Everybody felt responsible so we all took responsibility for it.

Keane could not be more wrong in his assessment and his ignorance reflects a disturbing lack of awareness within the media in general but particularly within RTE of the reality of how Ireland is really governed.

Let’s take the political violence argument first.

Keane, along with a great deal of Irish journalists, politicians and other commentators, has this bizarre idea in his head that, somehow, political violence in Ireland is special.

So, the death of an Irish citizen by bomb or bullet is infinitely more painful, more horrifying than the violent death of a citizen in Iraq or Afghanistan.

I remember a few years ago Ryan Tubridy losing the run of himself during an interview with a victim of the Northern Ireland conflict.

I’m so impressed with your courage; your suffering is surely the worst in history. (Or words to that effect).

I could almost hear the gears grinding in Tubridy’s head:

A bit over the top Ryan, what about World War One and Two, what about the Holocaust, the Inquisition, the countless billions of others who suffered and died in wars?

He eventually spluttered: Of course that’s not to take away from others who have suffered throughout history.

Leaving aside for the moment the absolute horror and loss personally suffered by the victims of the NI conflict it was, in reality, a dirty little war fought over a long, long, thirty years with a tiny death rate (about 3,000) in comparison to over half a million and counting in Iraq, 100,000 and counting in Syria which includes the death of nearly 7,000 children and over 4,000 women.

As for those of us in the Republic, there was no war, no suffering apart from some bombings and shootings which, while horrifying for those involved, did not have any substantial affect on the lives of the general public.

This apparent widespread idea that political violence in Ireland (1916, Civil War, NI conflict and all the rest) sets the Irish above the rest of the world in terms of political violence and suffering is part of the delusion that allows journalists and others to live in a bubble of denial.

And it is from inside that bubble of denial that Keane formed his second reason as to why Irish citizens are so docile in the face of the ongoing economic catastrophe.

I’ll come back to this in my next article.

Copy to:
Fergal Keane

Tubridy and Ireland's 'reputation'

Ahhhh…. You have to feel sorry for poor old Ryan Tubridy.

He’s all upset because the New York Times told the truth about Ireland.

The article has embarrassed us as a nation he said.

The article could be damaging to Ireland’s reputation, he said.

The journalist who wrote the article should be brought before some regulator or other, he said.

The New York Times should hang their heads for getting it so wrong, he said.

Well, from what I’ve read, the NYT got it absolutely right except for the funny claim that some guy was living on pigeons to survive.

Tubridy talks about Ireland’s reputation.

I ask – what reputation?

Mary O'Rourke's memoir: Self-serving and delusional

The following review of Mary O’Rourke’s memoir, Just Mary, appears on Amazon.

I really enjoyed this book, the story of Mary’s life and her political career! An honest politician with great ethical principles. So nice to read about someone like this!

Practically all the reviews are in the same vein. The following is my contribution on Amazon.

This book is little more than a self-serving, delusional attempt by O’Rourke to distance herself and her beloved Fianna Fail party from any blame for the economic catastrophe visited upon Ireland and its people.

Ireland’s economic downfall and international disgrace in 2008 was the end result of decades of political corruption principally led by Fianna Fail under the corrupt politician Charles Haughey and his incompetent successors.

O’Rourke was and remains a strong supporter and admirer of Haughey. It was Haughey who first appointed her to ministerial office and she remained a loyal supporter throughout his career and beyond.

O’Rourke’s admiration for the corrupt Haughey is reflected in her decision to dedicate a separate chapter describing a Christmas visit to his home.

This visit took place after Haughey’s corruption had been exposed and suggests that she has more respect and admiration for the traitor than she does for her country and its people.

O’Rourke blames everybody for the economic catastrophe visited upon the Irish people allowing only token, mealy mouthed, admissions that Fianna Fail may have been to any degree responsible.

She blames the global financial crisis, Fianna Fail’s coalition partners, The Progressive Democrats and, most disgracefully of all, the ordinary people of Ireland.

In her own words:

The biggest factor in our decline as a party was the blight of the global recession which hit us in 2008.

There is no escaping the fact that some aspects of their (Progressive Democrats) central philosophy and the concrete measures which this engendered – such as policies on taxation and financial regulation – undermined our effectiveness during a crucial time in government.

But most of all, this arrogant politician blames the people of Ireland (my emphasis).

Banks can be blamed for speculation but they were responding to demands from the people – It is the people who pressed for such financial facilities. Everyone wanted the bigger house, the next holiday the private school for their offspring and so it went on and on.

Throughout the book O’Rourke expresses very little real compassion or anger in response to the events following the collapse of the economy with one glaring exception – when she addresses how the media and ordinary Irish citizens have responded to Fianna Fail’s part in the catastrophe.

When writing about those who dare to criticise her beloved Fianna Fail party her anger is as uncompromising as it is revealing.

The paragraph is worth reproducing in full as it provides us with a clear insight into the delusional world in which O’Rourke operates.

I find it utterly outrageous that it is considered nefarious to be a member, even a grassroots member, of our party and as I write this today, this seems to be the common thread emerging in the media and in public discourse.

I rail against the fact that there are many writers and commentators who in my opinion could be accused of breaching the code of incitement to hatred, in the way in which they write and talk about Fianna Fail.

`Toxic’, `disreputable’, `underhand’: all these adjectives about us are heaped one upon another. I feel it is strongly reprehensible and grossly unfair to the ordinary men and women throughout the country who are the foot soldiers, unpaid, of the party of Fianna Fail.

How dare people cast aspersions upon them? It is as if over all those years, the pent-up hatred of the success of Fianna Fail has cut loose and commentators are giving vent to it, and in a way that completely lacks proportion or even-handedness.

It is nothing short of delusional to suggest that words like `toxic, `disreputable’ and `underhand’ could be used as a basis for accusing writers and commentators of breaching the code of incitement to hatred.

This is particularly so when much stronger words like `corrupt’, `criminal’ and traitorous are entirely appropriate when commentating on Fianna Fail’s political record.

It is nothing short of delusional on a grand scale to suggest, as O’Rourke does, that the negative reaction to Fianna Fail following the economic catastrophe has little to do with the activities of its members and leaders but is entirely down to jealously of Fianna Fail’s success as a political party.

But as delusional as she may be it cannot be denied that O’Rourke is immensely popular with the media and general public.

Her book is a best seller and has received an almost universally positive reaction.

On principle I could not bring myself to add to O’Rourke’s wealth by actually buying the book and so had to wait about two months to obtain it from my local library.

When I finally got my hands on it the librarian asked me to return it as soon as possible as there was a long waiting list.

It is disturbingly ironic that Irish citizens who probably cannot afford to buy the book principally because of the financial devastation caused by O’Rourke’s beloved Fianna Fail are queuing up to read all about her absolute loyalty to that very party.

Indeed, O’Rourke’s popularity within the media and throughout the general public can be seen as a measure of just how far Irish citizens have to go before they grasp the true meaning of democratic accountability.

DPP not to act against Mick Wallace

On October 8 2012 I submitted a formal complaint against Mick Wallace TD to Cobh Gardai.

The complaint was in response to Wallace’s admission on live radio that he hired a hitman to recover an outstanding debt from a building contracts manager.

I heard nothing more on the matter from Cobh Gardai until I contacted them nearly a year later on 10 September last.

I was informed that my complaint had been passed on to Wexford Gardai two days after submission, presumably because Wallace is based in Wexford.

I received no communications from Wexford Gardai until I phoned the station on October 8 last, exactly one year after I had submitted my complaint.

The investigating officer informed me that my complaint had been submitted to the DPP who directed, in January 2013, that no prosecution should be taken.

I was not informed of this decision.

I requested more details from the investigating officer.

Did you carry out an investigation or did you just submit my complaint to the DPP?

I submitted an investigation.

Did you contact Mick Wallace?

I’m not going to say what I did or didn’t do but I investigated the complaint.

Is there any information at all you can give me regarding your investigation?

No, I’m not going to give you any information.

I find that a bit strange. Is the investigation you carried out totally confidential?

I’m not going to tell you the ins and outs of it. All I will say to you, and you can take whatever you want out of this, is that I carried out the relevant inquiries and submitted a file to the DPP.

The following is my assessment of this case.

It is obvious that neither the Gardai nor the DPP thought it necessary to inform me of what was happening. If I had not made enquiries I would never have known what action had been taken as a result of my complaint.

In common with the many complaints I have submitted over the years against politicians, civil servants and others I did not for a moment expect that charges would actually be brought against Mick Wallace.

My principal motive for submitting such complaints is to highlight the fact that Ireland is a deeply dysfunctional state where certain categories of citizens seem to be virtually untouchable when it comes to law enforcement.

At some point in the distant future when Ireland is a fully accountable democracy the following will be the norm.

Police investigators will be legally required to keep complainants informed of the progress of any investigation.

The DPP will be legally required, without revealing substantial facts, to regularly publish lists of complaints/cases that have been submitted stating whether they are to be prosecuted or rejected.

Senator Norris: Politicians must not display their elite/privileged position too blatantly

The following pompous/patronising statement was delivered by Senator David Norris in May 2011 during the first session of the current Senate.

It is our responsibility by reason of our privileged position not to encourage the notion that we are a special class. Politicians are merely ordinary people who have taken on an extra burden of responsibility on behalf of the wider community. We should not see ourselves or behave as if we were an elite.

On the same occasion Senator Norris pompously compared the parochial, elitist club that is Seanad Eireann with the Roman Republic and its senate.

As if there was even the remotest link between the greatness of ancient Rome and the activities of a crowd of gombeen bog trotters labouring under the delusion that they live in an accountable democracy.

The most deadly animal of all: The raging elephant of corruption

Two recent events serve to demonstrate just how far this country is away from facing reality.

Labour Senator Denis Landy publicly announced that someone had attempted to bribe him within the confines of our parliament.

The media response to this sensational event was moderate at best. There was no state response whatsoever.

A mother and child were attacked by a Tapir in Dublin zoo.

The media response was wall to wall and even now, days after the event, it is still being reported.

Take RTE for example: The incident was reported and analysed at length on Morning Ireland, Today with Myles Dungan, News at One, Liveline and Drivetime.

It made headline news for several days in all the newspapers and some even felt the need to make editorial comment.

On Liveline we heard Joe Duffy asking a caller such penetrating questions as:

Would a sheep make such an attack?

Oh yes, replied the caller, but sheep are weak so wouldn’t do as much damage.

Another caller went into forensic detail about how she was savagely attacked by a cat fourteen weeks ago.

Was it painful, asked Joe?

I never felt pain like it said the savaged woman.

Describe the cat, prompted Joe.

After a detailed description of the deadly cat the woman pleaded with the nation to be on the lookout for the monster.

She finished by warning the nation of just how deadly cats can be.

Cats are more dangerous than dogs because they constantly clean themselves. It’s the salvia, you know, all the germs are collected in the salvia and if they bite you, well, you’re doomed.

Notwithstanding the horror and pain suffered by the victims in Dublin zoo, this event is a non-story. The mother tapir, like all mothers, acted to defend her offspring – end of story.

Meanwhile, the Labour Party, elected to power principally to deal with the rampant political and financial corruption that effectively destroyed the lives of a majority of Irish citizens, announced that the bribery allegations made by Senator Landy had nothing to do with them. It was a private matter for the Senator and they were going to do nothing.

As a country we have not moved ahead by one inch in tackling the disease of political/financial corruption since the days when the criminal politician Haughey made such activity an integral part of our national heritage.

Instead, we grasp at any excuse, no matter how ridiculous, to avoid talking about the most deadly animal of all – the raging elephant of corruption that’s dancing all over our lives.

Labour Party continues the betrayal of Ireland and its people

That’s a matter for himself.

With this short sentence the Labour Party has confirmed and condemned itself as part of the corrupt political/administrative system that has destroyed this country.

When asked if the party was concerned that one of its senators had alleged he was bribed a spokesperson said:

That’s a matter for himself.

So let’s be crystal clear about what’s happening here.

Labour is refusing to act on this extremely serious matter because it is presently holding power within our corrupt political/administrative system.

It hardly needs to be said that if Labour was in opposition and a senator from another party claimed he had been bribed they would be jumping up and down for a political and police investigation.

The first decision every person elected to our Dail or Senate must make, either consciously or subconsciously, is:

Will I challenge the corrupt system or will I say nothing and keep my head down?

The vast bulk of TDs and Senators decide, either consciously or subconsciously to support and, if necessary, defend the corrupt system.

Every such decision does enormous damage to Ireland and its people particularly since the economic collapse of 2008.

Every such decision puts off the day when the Irish people can enjoy the benefits of living in a functional democracy where the rule of law applies to all and not just to those without power and influence.

Every politican who courageuosly challenges the corrupt system is immediately attacked by its members and ejected from its ranks.

Roisin Shortall and Nessa Childers are among the very small number of politicians who had the courage and integrity to challenge the system.

Because courage and integrity are strictly prohibited within our corrupt political system they had to go in order for the system to survive.

Nessa Childers chillingly described what can happen to even the most idealistic politician:

I felt I was being corrupted by the system.

Unfortunately, the vast bulk of initially idealistic politicans allow the system to infect them, to one degree or another, with the disease of corruption.

Senator Landy’s refusal to report the very serious crime of attempted bribery is an indication of how the corrupt system can warp the principles and integrity of even the most patriotic politician.

The Labour Party’s absolute refusal to act on the matter is an indication of just how corrupt the entire political system has become.

And let me be clear, Labour are not alone in abandoning truth, honesty and intergrity when operating within the corrupt political system.

To date every Irish political party, when faced with scandal and corruption, have opted to defend the rotten system and thus preserve their power rather than standing up for Ireland and its people.

Here’s former Progressive Democrats TD, Fiona O’Malley’s response to scandal and corruption.

It’s something that has always annoyed me, that the PDs are watchdogs. We have our own standards. Every other political party is responsible for their own standards within their own party. We are not watchdogs for any other party.

Green Party leader and then Minister for the Environment John Gormley when he had to decide whether to challenge the corrupt system or remain in power.

We never assigned ourselves that role because it’s a role which you cannot fulfill properly and do your work as well. We’re not the moral watchdog of any political party…we look after our probity and our standards…we cannot be responsible for events that took place before our entry into government.

And current Minister for Social Protection Joan Burton effectively rejecting the ethical standards of Roisin Shortall in favour of Minister Reilly’s stroke politics.

The fortunes of individual politicians and political parties comes after the issue of restoring the fortunes and the businesses and the employment that’s been lost in this country, and that’s our objective.

These politicians are, effectively, denying that they have any responsibility to challenge, defeat and root out the disease of corruption that has inflicted so much pain and suffering on Irish citizens.

Labour’s short but extremely damaging response to the latest allegations of corruption continues the betrayal by the body politic of Ireland and its people in favour of retaining power and influence within a hopelessly corrupt system.

That deeply depressing situation will not change until the people of Ireland are blessed with a politician or political party that never sees corruption as a personal matter for individual politicians but rather as a dangerous disease that requires immediate extermination.

Copy to:

Senator Landy
All political parties

Formal complaint to Gardai and Clerk of the Seanad in response to Senator Landy's allegations of bribery

On 1 August last I submitted a formal complaint in writing to Cobh Gardai in response to allegations of bribery made by Labour Senator Denis Landy (See full complaint below).

I also submitted a formal request to the Select Committee on Members’ Interests Seanad Éireann to investigate the matter.

This submission was made to the Clerk of the Seanad by email.

The Clerk of the Seanad rejected my request on the following grounds.

One: It was made via email. Apparently, all such submissions must be made in hard copy and physically posted to the Clerk of the Seanad.

While endearing, this insistence on using an ancient communications system does not auger well for those who argue that the Senate is a viable institution that should be retained.

Two: I requested an investigation into the matter rather than making a complaint. Apparently, I should have made a formal complaint under Section 8 (2) of the Ethics in Public Office Acts 1995 and 2001.

Crucially, this legislation only allows for a member of the public to make a complaint against a member (of the Houses of the Oireachtas) who may have contravened Sections 5 or 7 or done a specified act.

In plain English, this means that a complaint must be made under Section 8 (2) of the Act and therefore must be made against a member.

The Catch 22 is, of course, that I am not making a complaint against a member. I am making a complaint regarding allegations of a very serious crime that took place within the Houses of the Oireachtas.

The strict adherence to the letter of the law/legislation by bureaucrats and the absence of any mechanism by which a complaint can be made regarding allegations of criminal activity within the confines of the Houses of the Oireachtas means that my complaint is likely to be rejected on the grounds that I am not making a specific complaint against a specific member.

The following exchange between myself and a senior official at the office of the Clerk of the Seanad makes this very clear.

Me: Should I submit it as a complaint?

Official: Yes, a complaint is the word used in the Act. You may make a complaint in respect of a specified act, as in an action. The Act says that a person who considers that a member (emphasised) of the Oireachtas may have contravened Sections 5 or 7 of the Act or done a specified act, something that is not permitted may make a complaint to the Clerk, so your complaint must relate to a member.

Me: In other words, my complaint must be against a member?

Official: Yes.

Me: So what you’re saying is that my complaint is going to be rejected because I will not be making a complaint against a member?

Official: I’m not saying that but I can see how that is a logical conclusion.

Me: I can’t see any other conclusion given what you’ve said to me.

Official: Yes.

Irish citizens who will be voting to abolish or retain the Senate later this year will be wise to consign this archaic, expensive and totally useless institution to the history books.

After all, that’s the bubble in which its members, regulations and procedures actually exist.

Copy to:
Clerk of the Seanad
All political parties
Michael McDowell

See below:
Complaint to Cobh Gardai
Request for investigation to Clerk of the Seanad
Reply (rejection email) from Clerk of Seanad
Second complaint to Clerk of Seanad

Cobh Garda Station
Cobh
Co Cork

1 August 2013

To Whom It May Concern:

I wish to formally report allegations of bribery made by Labour Senator Denis Landy as reported in the Irish Independent on 21 July 2013.

Senator Landy claimed that he was offered a plush holiday to coincide with a series of votes on the referendum to abolish the Seanad.

Senator Landy was reported as saying:

“I was approached by an individual in Leinster House and offered flights and a stay in a top hotel in New York should I go missing during this week.”

I have included below the full Irish Independent report.

Yours Sincerely

Anthony Sheridan

Signed:

——————————————————————————————————-

First submission to Clerk of the Seanad

29th July 2013

To Whom It May Concern:

This is a formal request to the Committee on Members Interests (Seanad Éireann) to investigate a claim by Senator Denis Landy that he was offered a plush foreign holiday to coincide with a series of votes on the referendum to abolish the Seanad.

Senator Landy expressed the opinion that the offer was made in an attempt to defeat the Government or, that he was effectively offered a bribe.

I include a report on the matter published in the Irish Independent on 21st July last.

Yours Sincerely
Anthony Sheridan

Reply from Clerk of the Seanad

Dear Mr Sheridan,

I refer to your email of 29 July 2013 in which you make a request in the following terms:
“This is a formal request to the Committee on Members Interests (Seanad Éireann) to investigate a claim by Senator Denis Landy that he was offered a plush foreign holiday to coincide with a series of votes on the referendum to abolish the Seanad.”

While members of the public can correspond directly with Committees on any matter, I would note that there is no statutory procedure to request the Committee on Members’ Interests to commence an investigation.

There is however a statutory complaints procedure available to members of the public under the Ethics in Public Office Acts 1995 and 2001. Section 8(2) states “a person…who considers that a member… may have contravened sections 5 or 7 or done a specified act may make a complaint …to the Clerk …”.

Under the same section, The Clerk of the Seanad refers complaints to the Members’ Interests Committee of Seanad Éireann unless s/he forms the opinion that the complaint is frivolous or vexatious or that there is “not sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case in relation to the complaint”.
If the complaint is rejected, the Clerk is obliged to send the complainant, the member concerned and the Committee a statement of reasons for so doing.

Therefore, please confirm if you wish for me to treat your correspondence as a formal complaint in line with the procedure under the Ethics Acts. If you confirm that you do not want to make such a complaint, your correspondence will then be forwarded to the Committee.

If you choose to follow the complaints procedure outlined it is crucial that you provide to me all evidence available to you which is relevant to your complaint.
This information will assist me in considering whether the complaint must be sent to the Committee. If you do choose to make such a complaint I should be obliged if you would also sign your letter and return the signed copy to me.

You may rest assured that on receipt of this further information, this matter will be dealt with promptly in so far as I and the Clerk are concerned.
Please find attached an appendix with certain relevant sections of the Ethics Acts enclosed.
Yours sincerely,

Second submission to Clerk of Seanad (By post)

8th August 2013

To: The Clerk of the Seanad.

This is a formal complaint made under the Ethics in Public Office Acts 1995 and 2001, Section 8 (2) regarding a reported incident that occurred within the Houses of the Oireachtas on a date between the 1st and 19th July 2013.

The complaint concerns a claim by Labour Senator Denis Landy that he was offered a plush holiday to coincide with a series of votes on the referendum to abolish the Seanad.

Senator Landy is reported as saying:

“I was approached by an individual in Leinster House and offered flights and a stay in a top hotel in New York should I go missing during this week.”

Senator Landy expressed the opinion that the offer was made in an attempt to defeat the Government.

According to the report Senator Landy has refused to name the person who approached him but he did describe the person as a political figure.

The incident was first reported in the Sunday Independent on 21st July 2013. I have included the complete report below.

The response of some politicians, as reported in the Irish Independent of 24th July, may be helpful in considering the matter.

Labour Seanad chief whip Aideen Hayden is reported as saying:

“It is obviously a very serious matter if someone has attempted to subvert the workings of the house in this way.

Seanad leader Maurice Cummins called on Mr Landy to report the matter to the Gardai. The Fine Gael senator told the Seanad that allegations of bribery and corruption were an extremely serious matter.

Rebel Fine Gael senator Fidelma Healy Eames also called on Mr Landy to give the “truth” about what had happened.

“If someone attempted to bribe him to absent himself from votes in this house last week, then that is very serious.”

Yours Sincerely
Anthony Sheridan

Fergus Finlay and the way Mary O'Rourke smells

I wrote a letter to the Irish Examiner recently suggesting that Fergus Finlay had spent too much time out in the midday sun after he described Michael McDowell as perhaps the greatest party leader the world has ever known.

In today’s Irish Examiner he attributes the sweet scent of Mary O’Rourke as a sense of hope for Ireland’s future.

Of course on this occasion, unlike his McDowell comments, Finlay has his tongue firmly in his cheek but beneath his wanderings there is a serious message.

Opinion makers like Finlay seem to suffer from a unique blindness in their ability to recognise what people like O’Rourke really represent.

They seem to be totally unaware (or are in denial) that this woman represents the rotten political system that has wreaked so much damage on Ireland and its people.