Tallaght Hospital scandal: No need for accountability

I wrote recently about the missing link that marks the difference between how things are done in Ireland and how they’re done in functional democracies.

When suspicions of corruption are raised in functional jurisdictions there usually follows an investigation by an independent authority.

If the suspicions are confirmed consequences follow such as sackings, heavy fines or perhaps a trial followed by appropriate punishment.

All this is done under the principle of justice being seen to be done and the whole matter is usually followed up with new rules/regulations to prevent such events from happening again.

All these stages of accountability are also carried out in Ireland with the notable exception of holding anybody to account.

The recent scandal at Tallaght Hospital, as reported in the Irish Examiner, is a great example.

Background:

The hospital is unable to explain why five senior officials received almost €700,000 in non-salary ‘top-up’ fees between 2005 and 2010.

Ernst and Young carried out a financial investigation last year as a result of concerns raised by the Health Information Quality Authority (HIQA).

The investigation found:

The hospital was unable to provide any documents showing why the large payments were made.

The hospital was unable to explain why the supplementary payroll, under which the payments were made, was set up or what approval procedures were followed.

Board members at the time provided inconsistent recollections as to the existence and approval of the fund.

One individual received €225,833 in extra pay. Four other staff members received €104.667, €61,250, €24,000 and 259.000 respectively.

This was all taxpayer’s money at a time when Tallaght Hospital was making severe cutbacks to its budget.

We have now reached the critical point where, in a functional democracy, stronger action would ensue – police investigation, courts etc.

In Ireland this stage is skipped completely and replaced by an excuse stage.

Significant management structure changes have been carried out at the hospital – we’re told.

The new management has ‘noted’ the findings of the investigation.

The external payroll system responsible for the payouts has been abolished.

The new board has appointed a new remuneration and terms of services committee.

The new board said they were disturbed and upset by what happened.

So, no further action, no police, no investigation, no courts.

And, we can ask, is the new board a genuine improvement on its predecessor. Will this ‘new broom’ sweep all the old habits away and act in a professional and responsible manner when it comes to accountability?

No, is the emphatic answer.

When asked if the five members at the centre of the scandal were still working at the hospital and whether any of the paid out money can be retrieved they declined to comment.

Or, in plain English – Take a hike, we’re saying nothing.

The only reason, I suspect, the board of Tallaght Hospital can feel confident in refusing to answer this most basic of questions is because of the missing link in Irish accountability.

It there’s no system of accountability – there’s no need to be accountable.

Catholic Church and burning bodies

Letter in today’s Irish Times.

Sir,

Almost 20 years ago, the bodies of 22 women were exhumed from private land.

The identity of these women is still not known and no attempt has been made by the State or by the religious institution who interred these women, stripping them not only of their names but of their identity and of their existence, to find out who they were.

On the discovery of the 22 bodies on the grounds of High Park convent in Drumcondra, home to the Sisters of Our Lady of Charity and Refuge, the Irish State responded in a way which epitomises the utter disregard they had and have for women.

The Department of Environment issued a licence allowing the nuns to have the remains of the additional 22 women removed to Glasnevin for cremation, no investigation, no questions, no vigil, nothing.

Mary Raftery wrote about this travesty of justice, this unspeakable crime against women by both church and State almost 10 years ago.

It is indicative of the apathy of the Irish people and state that 10 years since Mary Raftery wrote this article, exposing the criminal nature of State-church collusion, we are still waiting for an apology for the enslavement and brutal treatment of Irish women.

It is not up to Enda Kenny alone to apologise but to us, as a nation, to show true remorse and come together to recognise and remember these forgotten women.

Yours, etc,

Medb McKevitt
Dublin

I strongly disagree with the letter writer’s opinion that the people of Ireland are in any way responsible for the horrors perpetrated by the Catholic Church in collusion with the State.

It must have been extremely difficult, and impossible in most cases, for an individual or even a group of individuals to challenge an evil, Nazi type organisation like the Catholic Church that ruthlessly exploited the absolute power bestowed upon it by a corrupt political system.

Response to Fingleton documentary

Letter in today’s Irish Times.

Sir,

Which Irish bank collapsed the most spectacularly relative to the size of its assets? Irish Nationwide.

Who said that the building society’s lending practices in the old Fingleton regime were “shoddy” and “well below standard“? Gerry McGinn former CEO of Irish Nationwide (Business, April 23rd, 2010).

Commenting on this, who said, “It seems extraordinary that none of this seems to have been reported by the auditors.” Labour Finance spokesperson at the time, Joan Burton.

Who were auditors to Irish Nationwide in the 10 years up to its collapse? KPMG.

Who has just been appointed as liquidator to IBRC? KPMG.

Who made this decision? Faceless pensionable mandarins in the Department of Finance.

Will we as a nation ever learn? No.

Joe Hackett
Dublin

Fingleton: The most important question was not asked

The RTE documentary on Michael Fingleton should not have been about Fingleton. Nor should it have been about what was, effectively, his private bank, Irish Nationwide.

It should have been about those responsible for permitting ruthless and greedy individuals like Fingleton to do pretty much as they pleased.

It should have been about the abject failure of the Central Bank and the now defunct Ifrsa to rein in this rogue banker.

Fingleton was just a greedy banker. He was good at manipulating people and the political/business environment in which he operated.

In that respect he was no different from all the other greedy bankers who were allowed to suck the lifeblood out of the country for generations to come.

Instead of broadcasting sensationalised documentaries that seem to be designed solely to trigger the anger of viewers the media should be ruthlessly focusing on those responsible for creating an environment where people like Fingleton can thrive.

That secretive, sleazy financial environment was created and is still strongly maintained by our corrupt political system.

So-called regulatory authorities like the Central Bank do not act independently of the political system.

There may be no direct instructions (although I suspect that there are) from politicians to regulators but over many decades a culture has evolved whereby regulators ‘know’ what is expected of them.

This is not just my opinion. The actions and non actions of regulators over many decades points clearly to a policy of looking the other way when it comes to white collar crime.

In Ireland it is not a case of soft-touch regulation, it is a case of no regulation whatsoever.

Here’s one of the very few references to the Regulator from the documentary.

So here we are nine years before Irish Nationwide goes bust, the Regulator has a report highlighting deficiences in its systems and practices and at the same time the Society is plunging headlong into ever larger developer deals, growing at a worrying pace.

This was just a building society but it wasn’t stopped.

So Irish Nationwide was going rotten, the Regulator knew it was going rotten. The failure to act ultimately cost Irish citizens €5.4 billion.

Why was it allowed to happen?

This is the question every journalist and media outlet in the country should be relentlessly demanding an answer to from those in power.

An irresponsible Central Bank still favouring the rich and powerful

Michael Fingleton’s lavish expenses and his refusal to return a €1 million bonus is the thing that will anger taxpayers the most according to an Irish Independent report today.

Regrettably, this is probably true.

Regrettably because the full force of public anger should focus on the betrayal by the so-called regulatory authority responsible for reigning in low-life individuals like Fingleton – The Central Bank.

In 2000 the Central Banks own consultants highlighted the lack of controls within Irish Nationwide when lending money.

Similar concerns were raised five years later in 2005 but no action was taken.

The figures are nothing short of incredible. Irish Nationwide advanced loans totalling €17 billion between 2003 and 2007.

Remember, this institution wasn’t even a bank, it was a bog standard building society.

Even with the very minimum of deliberation and paperwork, (which, apparently was the case) Fingleton must have been working 24/7 to deal with the sheer volume of cash flowing out of ‘his’ bank.

All this was done under the totally irresponsible eye of our facilitating Central Bank.

Next to our corrupt political system the Central Bank and other so-called regulatory agencies are principally responsible for the economic disaster visited upon the people of Ireland.

The Central Bank has a long and disgraceful history when it comes to protecting the interests of Ireland and its people.

Practically all decisions and actions/inactions by the Central Bank and other so-called regulatory agencies over the past several decades have benefitted rich and powerful interests while inflicting untold suffering on Irish citizens.

And in case there’s anybody out there labouring under the illusion that this particular leopard has changed its spots – it has not.

There is an ever-increasing body of evidence which suggests that the Central Bank is still operating under the same culture of favouring the rich at the expense of Ireland and its citizens.

Copy to:
Central Bank

DPPs directive: Some citizens are more equal than others?

What should have been a routine engagement between the police and a citizen over a very minor traffic infringement is, apparently, evolving into a bizarre and disturbing case of state bullying.

Clare Daly TD made an illegal right-hand turn and the Gardai are now preparing a file for the DPP to decide whether she should be prosecuted or not.

This is very unusual behaviour even in a dysfunctional jurisdiction like Ireland.

We are told that this action has been taken because of a directive from the DPPs office some years ago that obliges Gardai to send a file outlining the facts in any case attracting public attention before a decision can be reached about prosecution.

The directive only applies to cases where the subject of the file is a person in the public eye.

If I’m reading this correctly and I accept that I know nothing about the background of this directive and could be wrong, this revelation is more disturbing than the police actions against Clare Daly.

Was the directive introduced to protect ‘persons in the public eye’?

Was it introduced to allow powerful state authorities bypass an over enthusiastic police officer who had intentions against a ‘person in the public eye’?

But even if there is a legitimate reason for the directive it’s still a very disturbing revelation.

Its very existence seems to confirm what ordinary citizens have long suspected – that some citizens are more equal than others.

Garda Ombudsman: You are not entitled to any information whatsoever

Dublin TD Clare Daly believes that her arrest on a drink driving charge and the leaking of the story to the media was a deliberate attempt to discredit her because she has raised issues of malpractice within the Garda Siochana.

I agree with her conclusions.

Ms Daly was stopped by Gardai on 28 Jan last and breathalysed; the equipment did not register a reading.

Despite this Ms. Daly was arrested, handcuffed and taken to Kilmainham Garda Station 300 metres down the road.

When she objected to being handcuffed she was told that it was procedure.

Her legal team has told her that this is incorrect.

She was put in a cell and a doctor was called to take a urine sample.

Upon being released a female Garda told her to come back when she was sober.

Turns out she was sober. The urine sample showed that her alcohol level was 33% below the allowable limit.

Ms. Daly made a complaint and the Garda Ombudsman is investigating.

When the penalty points scandal first broke I rang the Garda Ombudsman office to inquire if they were investigating the very serious allegations being made against the force.

I was told that they can only investigate matters that involve complaints from members of the public who have been directly wronged by a Garda or a matter that they deem to be in the public interest

I rang again today to see if they were still of the view that it wasn’t in the public interest to investigate what are potentially the most serious allegations of corruption within the force.

Predictably, I ended up with a headache from banging my head against the solid wall of unaccountable bureaucracy.

Me: Is the Garda Ombudsman investigating the abuse of penalty points allegations?

Official: We can’t give out any information about complaints you haven’t made yourself.

Me: But I’m not referring to a complaint, I’m asking is there an investigation into the penalty points allegations.

Official: I can’t say, I’m not allowed to say because you’re not involved in it and you haven’t made a complaint yourself.

I can’t give you any information about anything, about any investigation or any complaints.

Me: Absolutely nothing? Nobody is entitled to know whether you’re investigating something or not?

Official: No, not unless you’re involved.

Me: That’s incredible.

Official: It’s confidential.

Me: I find that hard to believe. You’re saying that the general public is not allowed to know whether the Garda Ombudsman is investigating any particular matter.

Official: No. I can’t give out any information about any complaints.

Me: What regulation/legislation are you basing your refusal on?

Official: It’s confidential.

Me: Yes, but could you refer me to the regulation that permits you to refuse the information.

Official: It’s a confidential procedure making a complaint; I can’t give out any information on the matter.

Me: Ok, that’s fine but could you point me to the particular legislation that allows you to refuse the information?

Official: If you’re not happy with my answer you can put it in writing to the Commission.

Me: Yes, I’m accepting your answer; I’m just asking what legislation you’re basing your refusal on. Can I find the relevant legislation on your website.

Official: I don’t look at the website, I don’t know.

Me: There is a ‘legislation’ link on your website, would I find it there?

Official: If you’re not happy with my answer you can put it in writing to the Commission.

Me: So you’re refusing to reveal the legislation under which you’re refusing to give out information?

Official: I’ve just advised you, if you’re not happy with my answer you can put it in writing.

Me: Are you refusing to point out the legislation to me?

Official: I can’t give it to you.

Me: Why not?

Official: Hung up.

Pat Kenny: Horsemeat? Ah sure eat away, it'll do you no harm

Catherine Brown, the Food Standards Agency in the UK, said that it was highly likely that criminal activity was to blame for horsemeat being found in some meals.

But Pat Kenny is not worried about the latest revelation that some beef lasagne is actually 100% horsemeat.

There’s nothing unsafe about it, says Pat.

If you fancy having a go of it, off you go. It’s not going to kill you.

As I wrote the other day, this is to make the dangerous assumption that criminals are operating to the same high standards as that of legitimate meat processors.

Pat withdrew his advice after a caller reminded him that the horses used could have been laced with dangerous drugs.

Yuk factor complacency

The so-called Yuk factor seems to be an accepted rationale in the ongoing horsemeat scandal.

The Yuk factor stems from the fact that horsemeat is not generally on the menu in Ireland and is therefore seen by most Irish consumers as a yuk food.

The general thrust of media coverage seems to be that while horsemeat may be a yuk food for the Irish it is perfectly safe and won’t damage their health.

This assumption only stands up if those (criminals?) who are illegally importing the horsemeat into Ireland have a world class processing plant where the highest EU standards in food production are strictly observed.

Somehow, I think this is unlikely.

It’s more likely that the horsemeat is sourced from anywhere they can get it for a knockdown price such as knacker’s yards or from farmers wanting to get rid of rotten carcasses.

And who’s to say it’s just horsemeat? It could quite easily be a mixture of roadkill and abattoir waste from a whole range of animals, wild and domesticated.

Mmmm… I think the yuk factor could be a lot more yuckier than people realise.

Freeza Meats: That meat was just resting in our storeroom?

One of the very funny running jokes in the Fr. Ted series refers to some dodgy accountancy by Fr. Ted in a previous parish.

Fr. Ted, whenever the matter is raised angrily retorts:

That money was just resting in my account.

The joke came to mind after hearing the explanation provided by Freeza Meats for the presence of 80% horsemeat in a product stored at their plant in Newry.

They claim they were approached last August by a meat trader who offered to sell them meat. They declined but, as a goodwill gesture to the meat trader, they agreed to store the meat at their plant.

They claim they never purchased the material, it was never their material, it was kept in a separate area, it had nothing to do with them.

Or, in other words – That meat was just resting in our storeroom.