Shane Ross: Breaking the rules of his own political class

 

 

austerity

By Anthony Sheridan

The first rule of Irish mainstream media when it comes to corruption is – under no circumstances whatsoever should the issue be actually addressed, analysed or even mentioned.

So we had the usual conservative pro-establishment packed panel on the Marian Finucane Show last Sunday discussing the Olympic ticket corruption scandal.

But, sticking strictly to the rule, the issued of corruption was completely ignored as the panel focused on attacking the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Shane Ross over his handling of the scandal.

The reason for such attacks on Ross is clear. Although he is an establishment insider himself, he has been breaking another golden rule of the ruling elite – he actually investigates and reports on the rampant corruption within his own political/media class.

This is an unforgiveable sin and attracts vicious rants laced with lies from people like former Labour minister for State Aodhan O’Riordan.

The issue here is that anybody who shared the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) with Shane Ross over the last five years know exactly the way he operates. There is no reputation that he is not happy to have a complete go at in order to get five minutes publicity out of, this is the way he has operated for a long time.

Copy to:

Marian Finucane Show

Aodhan O’Riordan

Shane Ross

Irish Olympic cheaters are heroes: Russian Olympic cheaters are evil

 

e990d2_56153bd3f6584c069a8572099977743b

By Anthony Sheridan

I have always believed that nationalism is as dangerous as religion on the basis that both mindsets operate only in the realm of the irrational.

Take for example this Irish Independent editorial written in response to the news that Irish boxer Michael O’Reilly had failed a dope test.

The headline gives us the first hint of the irrational.

Our heroic boxers don’t deserve cloud of scandal

Well, whatever about the rest of the boxing team Michael O’Reilly most certainly does deserve the cloud of scandal hovering over him on the rational fact that he did indeed fail a doping test.

The author makes it clear that our ‘heroic’ boxers are the greatest warriors to walk the face of earth while those nasty Russians are evil incarnate. (I exaggerate only very slightly here).

The cloud of scandal hanging over Irish boxers is not just unfair but monumentally so, the author thunders.

And why is it unfair?

Well, because this particular group of athletes has brought more glory and displayed more guts than any other in history.

This is where we enter the dangerous realm of the irrational where honesty and logic is twisted to suit the mindset of nationalism.

According to the author the doping finding for the Irish boxer is unfair because our boxers are glorious and gutsy.

But the Russians deserve to be severely punished because –

So many Games have been marred by the fact that cheaters have taken to the winners’ podium. This goes against everything that honest competition is about.

There must be no ambiguity; no athlete should ever get as far as the Olympics unless they are clean.

Copy to:

Irish Independent

Breaking: Sinn Fein responsible for melting Ice Caps

Global Warming.
Global Warming.

By Anthony Sheridan

Denis O’Brien ‘journalists’ just can’t help themselves when it comes to attacking Sinn Fein.

Paul Williams starts out in this article with a reasonable line on how Angelia Kerins may have been unfairly treated by the Public Accounts Committee.

But as always with most Irish ‘Independent’ journalists his real target is Sinn Fein.

PAC member Mary Lou McDonald, who, like her leader Gerry Adams, sneers on the fence claiming corruption and cover-ups at every turn while ignoring the vast amount of corruption and cover-ups (including murder, child abuse and racketeering) in the republican family.

No, really, this is an extract from the same article allegedly in support of Angelia Kerins, a matter that has nothing whatsoever to do with Sinn Fein.

And just last week Williams wrote about the connection between Sinn Fein and the melting of the Polar Ice Caps.

Ah no, only joking on that one but give him time, give him time.

Copy to:

Paul Williams

Cameron’s legacy: Irish Times gets it wrong

 

 

 

img

By Anthony Sheridan

 

His legacy will be defined and blighted by how he left office. Above all he will be blamed for Brexit.

The above is how an Irish Times editorial described the resignation of David Cameron.

Let’s try to figure out how the Brexit referendum ‘blighted’ Cameron’s legacy.

He decided to ask the people of the UK if they wanted to remain or leave the European Union. Now, admittedly, he did so under pressure from UKIP but that’s realpolitik for you. From what I observed Cameron conducted the campaign in a statesmanlike and honest fashion. Within hours of losing he delivered an impressive speech announcing his resignation – how does this blight his legacy?

Compare this to Irish politicians when they lose referendums. The democratic will of the people is ignored, the result is not accepted, and there are no resignations. The people are patronisingly told that they must have misunderstood the issue and are forced to vote again. Democracy is, in effect, suspended until the government gets its way.

Now lets compare this ludicrous assessment of Cameron’s legacy with how the legacy of the criminal politician Charles Haughey was assessed by former editor of the Irish Times, Geraldine Kennedy, in 2006.

Keep in mind that Haughey was a national traitor responsible for infecting the body politic with the disease of corruption. He plundered the state’s resources for decades and lived on bribes from rich businessmen who were richly rewarded by the criminal at the expense of Irish citizens. He was a ruthless bully and serial perjurer; he was a man who betrayed his wife and family for decades by openly whoring with every slut that came within range of his sleazy presence.

This was Kennedy’s assessment:

On this day, however, it is worth acknowledging that Charles Haughey was the most charismatic figure in Irish politics in living memory. Though small in stature, he had a great presence. He was an astute parliamentarian. He possessed his own particular sense of nationhood. And for good or ill, Mr. Haughey’s character, ambitions, beliefs and flaws are an integral part of the development of this modern State.

Irish Water/RTE and numbers

 

th

By Anthony Sheridan

This from Sinn Fein MEP Lynn Boylan on how much Irish Water has paid RTE in advertising costs.

Today I received confirmation through a Freedom of Information request to Irish Water how much the utility has spent on advertisement costs with the national broadcaster, RTÉ.

The figures released to me showed that the net cost of advertisement with RTE excluding VAT was €717,286 from the period of 2013-2015.

I wonder is there any correlation between this massive number and the tiny numbers of water protesters regularly reported by RTE News – just asking.

Irish Examiner compares water protesters with Provisional IRA

 

media-bias

By Anthony Sheridan

This is what the editor of the Irish Examiner thinks of water charges protesters:

Those who campaigned against the (water) charges might disagree and imagine, like the Provos, that they won the war when nothing more than a ceasefire has been called.

Make no mistake about it water charges will be imposed under one heading or another no matter how loudly the minority who oppose them shout.

Comparing citizens who engage in the democratic right of peaceful protest with the Provisional IRA is an indication of how far ethical/professional standards have fallen in mainstream media.

Copy to:

Irish Examiner

RTE: A mouthpiece for a corrupt regime?

 

vote_no_to_rte_bias_and_groupthink_by_christiantruthteller-d8qk1f5

By Anthony Sheridan

There is no evidence or even a claim that the murdered MP Jo Cox was the subject of abuse on social media. The only mention I am aware of is that she received ‘malicious communication of a sexual nature’ at her parliamentary office. This could have been by phone, letter, email, in person or social media.

But this lack of evidence has not stopped many Irish politicians and mainstream media jumping on the hypocrisy wagon to cynically exploit Ms. Cox’s brutal murder.

One particularly disgraceful example of this exploitation of a murder to promote an obvious agenda occurred on RTEs The Week in Politics.

The panel, as usual, was heavily weighed in favour of the government/establishment.

Representing the establishment view was Dara Murphy Fine Gael and Thomas Byrne Fianna Fail. Journalist Elaine Byrne and the presenter of the show, Aine Lawlor, represented mainstream media.

Against this stacked panel was Mick Barry of AAA/PBP, representing left wing politics and the anti-establishment view.

The bizarre line of questions put to Mr. Barry clearly exposed the biased agenda of RTE and is worth analysing to demonstrate that truth.

Aine Lawlor: Staying with the Irish response to immigration, we have a short clip of the controversial UKIP poster that attracted a lot of attention shortly before Jo Cox was murdered.

Viewers were shown a news clip of a British right wing politician promoting a right wing poster in favour of Brexit shortly before a right wing extremist murdered Jo Cox then, bizarrely; Lawlor put the following question to left wing politician Mick Barry.

Why is the politics of fear travelling particularly, as it seems, with a lot of working class voters, Labour voters, left wing voters in Britain?

Mr. Barry, while in the process of condemning extreme right wing politics in Britain and America, was interrupted by Lawlor.

But you know here in the past turbulent, painful years there were many people on the far Left who did target politicians personally. Do you regret that, I know there’s a lot of anger out there but has there been too much personalised anti politicians campaigning?

So Lawlor moved from discussing extreme right wing politics in the UK and the right wing murder of Jo Cox to asking Barry to express regret for the angry reaction of Irish citizens to the wholesale destruction of their lives by mainstream politicians.

The Fianna Fail politician on the panel, whose party was principally responsible for the catastrophe, was not asked to express any regret for his party’s actions. Neither was the right wing Fine Gael politician whose party ruthlessly continued and added to the suffering of Irish citizens.

This biased strategy of showing a news clip and then demanding a condemnation or an expression of regret has become common practice within RTE current affairs and seems to target only Sinn Fein and left wing politicians.

Clearly puzzled by Lawlor’s line of questioning Barry asked her what she was referring to.

I’m referring to a number of incidents which I think everybody else on the panel would… I’m not going to single out specific incidents because I don’t want to get into the ins and outs.

I’m talking about the way politicians were harassed at their homes, I’m talking about the online abuse that they got, I’m talking about a level of protest that has been endured by politicians here and certain politicians in Britain. You’re condemning it on the far right, I’m simply asking do you regret and deplore it on the far left as well.

Lawlor’s comment ‘I think everybody else on the panel would…’ suggests she was about to declare that everybody else on the panel agrees with her comments and her line of questioning.

The Fianna Fail and Fine Gael politicians were then allowed to join the attack on the so-called far left with little interference from Lawlor and again were not asked to condemn or express regret for the catastrophic damage their respective parties have inflicted on Ireland and its people.

When they finished their hypocritical and largely inaccurate comments Lawlor once again attacked Barry and left wing politics.

You’ve heard the two politicians beside you saying there are issues with some people on the Left and the way they have been harassing politicians – do you deplore that kind of individual harassment?

Keep in mind that the issue under discussion was the activities of UK right wing politicians and the murder of MP Jo Cox by a right wing extremist.

Here are some facts:

Ireland suffered more than any other country in the world as a result of the global economic collapse in 2008. The reason Ireland suffered so much is that, over decades, our corrupt political system created an environment of zero regulation that allowed bankers, property developers, lawyers and other elites to do as they pleased.

The response of the Irish people to the catastrophe visited upon them by corrupt politicians was the most peaceful, most responsible in the world – without exception.

RTE, while always conservative, was once a relatively professional and well balanced broadcaster.

Since 2008, and particularly since a significant percentage of Irish citizens began to rebel against political corruption, the broadcaster has become little more than a mouthpiece for the corrupt political regime.

Copy to:

RTE/Aine Lawlor

Dara Murphy

Thomas Byrne

Elaine Byrne

All political parties

Newstalk responds to complaint

 

 

570e2b875ec69.image

By Anthony Sheridan

Newstalk has responded to my complaint regarding comments by George Hook.  I include the response below and my reply.

Anthony,

Apologies once again for the delayed response to your complaint.

Having reviewed the programme in question and considered your complaint I do not believe that the segment referred to is in breach of our obligations under the Codes of Fairness, Objectivity and Impartiality in News and Current Affairs.

The Right Hook, the programme from which the segment is taken is not a news programme and George Hook is not a news reporter/presenter. The remit of his programme is broad current affairs. Section 21 of the Code does therefore not apply.

Section 22 as you note contends that  ‘It is an important part of the role of a presenter of a current affairs programme to ensure that the audience has access to a wide variety of views on the subject of the programme or item; to facilitate the expression of contributors‘ opinions – sometimes by forceful questioning; and to reflect the views of those who cannot, or choose not to, participate in content. This being so, a presenter and/or a reporter on a current affairs programme shall not express his or her own views on matters that are either of public controversy or the subject of current public debate such that a partisan position is advocated’. 

In the segment under discussion George Hook did not express his opinion such that a partisan position was being advocated. He expressed a perspective on the subject in question, a perspective that while suggested by many interactions of the programme may not otherwise have been heard.

Furthermore his expression of this perspective was in the context of a regular editorial delivered by him every evening at 4.30pm. As section 23 of the Code specifies such ‘personal view’ or  ‘authored’ current affairs segments ‘can be appropriate, subject to normal editorial controls …. [especially]  if part of a series of related segments/programmes which, taken together, will discharge the statutory obligations’. Listeners to this programme would have been very aware of this context and the content I believe did discharge the statutory obligations.

In summary, I do not believe that the programme in question breached our obligations under the Code.

Kind Regards,

—————

Thank you

I do not agree with your conclusions. I have already forwarded my complaint to BAI and will forward your response to the authority today.

Regards

Anthony

 

Newstalk: Contempt for listeners and broadcasting regulations

 

100_1178

By Anthony Sheridan

On 19 May last I made a formal complaint to Newstalk in response to comments made by George Hook on 11 May (Beginning of section one) about a number of politicians on the issue of water charges.

Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) regulations requires the station to acknowledge my complaint and respond within 20 days.

On 23 May I received an acknowledgement but, 33 days later, there has been no response.

This dismissive attitude by Newstalk to complaints is not only unprofessional, it also demonstrates contempt for listeners, broadcasting rules and regulations and the authority of the BAI.

I suspect that Denis O’Brien, the owner of Newstalk, would have released his lawyers within minutes if the comments made by Hook were directed at O’Brien.

I have now forwarded my complaint to the BAI for investigation.

Copy to:

Newstalk

BAI

Media exploiting the murder of Jo Cox

media

By Anthony Sheridan

You have to hand it to mainstream/establishment Irish media. They never waste an opportunity to exploit a tragedy to promote their own narrow agenda’s.

Here’s how the brutal murder of Jo Cox was exploited in the Irish Examiner, Irish Times, and Irish Independent.

Irish Examiner: Linked the murder to ‘an unruly mob’ of water protesters protesting against Joan Burton.

Irish Times: Linked the murder to the ‘wildly scurrilous realm of online debate’.

Irish Independent: As always, linked the murder to Sinn Fein/IRA.

None of these links have anything whatsoever to do with the murder of Jo Cox.