Paul Williams: A pathetic toady for Shatter and Callinan

In a previous article I wondered whether Irish Independent journalist Paul Williams was an uninformed novice or a heavily biased journalist writing with a particular agenda.

I suspected he was biased but in a subsequent article Williams has not only revealed his extreme bias but also his thin skin when anybody dares to challenge his very questionable journalism.

In what can only be described as a childish rant Williams reveals himself as an overly sensitive amateur when it comes to covering stories outside his comfort zone.

Instead of responding in a professional manner to journalists who strongly criticised his latest theory on the bugging scandal Williams headed for the gutter in search of sewage to throw at his perceived enemies.

Claiming he was attacked by a ‘marauding group’ of journalists barely out of college, liberal commentators, social media commentators and Sinn Fein Williams abandoned any trace of professionalism he may have possessed.

He was also strongly critical of RTEs ‘politically correct pundits’ but didn’t have the courage to actually name those he condemned.

Crying onto his keyboard he claimed he was being victimised for refusing to accept the wisdom of the ‘media mob’.

But Williams really confirmed his status as a gutter journalist when he resorted to a smear that I haven’t seen used in this country for many years.

Here, in his own words:

It was astonishing to watch as this marauding group swooped to defend a UK security company – some of whose employees are former agents of the dreaded crown – that was used by GSOC.

This crude attempt to stir up anti-British sentiment, particularly as Williams would be well aware that GSOC chairman Simon O’Brien is a UK citizen, is disgusting in the extreme.

This excuse for a journalist claims that his job in life is to put facts on paper and let the public make up their own minds.

In reality, he’s nothing but a pathetic toady for Shatter and Callinan.

Paul Williams: Biased in favour of Garda Commissioner and Minister for Justice?

Irish Independent journalist Paul Williams is an expert when reporting on crime.

He’s also a very courageous journalist, a man who has put his life on the line in his determination to expose those who operate in the murky criminal underworld.

It is clear, however, that when it comes to matters outside of his expertise Mr. Williams is either an uninformed novice or is a heavily biased journalist who writes with a particular agenda.

A recent article by him on the GSOC scandal makes the point.

Williams first claims that there was an unfair inference that ‘shadowy renegades’ within the Gardai were to blame.

Any informed, objective observer would immediately see that the Gardai, whether shadowy or official, were indeed the likely suspects.

It is standard police practice the world over to first focus on the most obvious suspects of a crime before considering other leads.

The Gardai are, without a shadow of doubt, the chief suspects in this case.

He next claims, and he clearly sees this as outrageous, that GSOCs decision not to alert Justice Minister Shatter of the bugging infers that they don’t trust him.

And that is effectively an insult to Shatter, who even his most vocal critics agree, is a man of unflinching integrity.

Objective journalists do not make such unambiguously supportive claims in favour of individuals, and particularly politicians, who are involved in serious controversy.

As for Shatter’s so-called integrity?

I don’t believe that a politician who effectively bullies a police officer when asked to provide a breath test is a man of integrity.

I don’t believe that a politician who attacks Garda whistleblowers who are courageously seeking justice and accountability is a man of integrity.

I don’t believe that a politician who uses confidential police information to attack a fellow politician is a man of integrity.

As part of his argument in support of the Gardai and Minister Williams quotes the Taoiseach’s (completely mistaken) claim that GSOC had a legal obligation to report the matter to the Justice Minister.

An objective journalist would have done his research by having a quick look at the easily accessible legislation.

Williams then goes on to claim that serious criminals and terrorists would be interested in bugging GSOC.

Not even the Garda Commissioner nor Shatter, both of whom are desperately struggling to put this scandal behind them, are prepared to make such a silly claim.

As I said at the beginning Mr. Williams seems to be either an uninformed novice or is heavily biased in favour of the Garda Commissioner and the Minister for Justice.

Given Mr. Williams’ long and close connections with the Gardai I suspect the latter is the case.

Copy to:
Paul Williams

Stephen Collins: No notion whatsoever of the reality of how Ireland is governed

Clientelism is the virus that gives life to the disease of corruption that has destroyed our country.

The corrupt political/administrative elite that spawned the virus has emerged victorious from the recent economic crisis with its powers enhanced.

The pain, suffering and despair of Irish citizens is guaranteed to continue as a result of this victory.

The media are a crucial element in the health of any democracy. It is through the media that most ordinary people turn to for professional analysis of on-going events. Indeed, it is reasonable to assert that a great deal of citizens actually vote according to opinions formed from listening/reading to media professionals.

Sadly, the quality of Irish journalism is very poor. While some journalists are professional, hardworking and objective far too many are either captured, incompetent/ignorant, support a political party or are just bone-lazy.

I’m not quite sure which category Irish Times columnist Stephen Collins fits into but I suspect, from reading his piece in today’s paper, that he has no notion whatsoever of the reality of how Ireland is actually governed.

Here’s what he has to say about the clientelism virus:

While clientelism certainly has negative aspects for good governance there is also a positive aspect to a political system in which the voters have such direct access to their politicians. For instance the social cohesion that marked the country’s response to the financial crisis and the bailout was a testament to the strength of our democratic institutions.

Fergal Keane: Completely blind to the brutal reality of how Ireland is (mis) governed

In my previous article I wrote about RTE journalist Fergal Keane’s view that Ireland’s history of political violence was one factor that has prevented Irish citizens from taking to the streets in response to the economic collapse.

Here, in his own words, is his second reason for the docility of Irish citizens in the face of economic catastrophe.

There’s a collective sense of guilt. Everybody sinned in one-way or another. People took out too many loans; they bought stuff they shouldn’t have bought. Everybody felt responsible for it so we all took responsibility for it.

This simplistic, preachy and uninformed view is downright insulting to Irish citizens.

The vast majority of citizens did not sin, did not take out too many loans; did not buy stuff they should not have.

But even if some people did make bad decisions does that mean they were responsible, as Keane suggests, for the catastrophe?

Does he seriously believe that the individual actions of ordinary citizens were responsible for the loss of our economic sovereignty?

Does he really believe that Irish citizens then decided, en masse, that they were to blame and that they should therefore quietly knuckle down and take due punishment for their ‘sins’?

Disturbingly, it seems Keane does believe the above. It seems that, in common with far too many journalists, he is completely blind to the brutal reality of how Ireland is (mis) governed.

So here, for his enlightenment, is the brutal truth.

Broadly speaking there are just two classes of citizen in Ireland, those with power and influence and those with no power whatsoever.

These classes operate within what is laughingly called Irish democracy.

Those without power constitute the great majority of citizens, the great unwashed.

Those with power constitute the professional classes, the business sector, senior civil servants (particularly those working in the so-called law enforcement sector), union leaders, sections of the media and the body politic.

It is very important to understand that the body politic is, essentially, a single class that supports and defends its culture of clientelism, gombeenism and corruption.

All Irish politicians, on entering the political class must abandon all scruples and principles they may have in order to remain members.

This cynical abandonment of principles has become an open and fully accepted aspect of Irish political culture.

Those very few with the courage to challenge the corrupt system are immediately and ruthlessly ejected from its ranks in case any smidgeon of principle should infect the culture of greed, arrogance and corruption.

Nessa Childers and Roisin Shortall are recent examples of what happens to politicians who break the unwritten laws of the ruling political elite.

The electorate is the fodder for this political class. They have just two useful functions – to vote the gombeens into office/power and hand over their hard earned money to pay for the incompetence, arrogance and corruption of their political abusers.

Unlike functional democracies, there is, in effect, no opposition in Ireland. Parties or groups of parties simply take turns in exercising and abusing power.

Those waiting in the wings for their turn at the feeding trough of public money produce an endless stream of mealy-mouthed bullshit that’s supposed to resemble the democratic process.

And why, it may be asked, do the Irish electorate put up with this rotten system, why did they not take to the streets as a united group to bring down the corrupt system that continues to do so much damage to their interests?

Political ignorance is the answer.

Irish citizens, after decades of living under the corrupt system of clientelism, have little idea of what real democracy means.

In a sentence, the majority of Irish citizens believe that power emanates downwards from the gombeens they elected in exchange for a few favours paid for by their own tax money.

In functional democracies the electorate are very much aware that it is the ordinary people who own power; that power emanates from the bottom up.

They rightly treat those elected to political office as little more than ordinary citizens who have been temporarily granted power to run the state.

Add a complete absence of courageous and visionary political leadership to a largely politically ignorant electorate and you have the Ireland of today:

A nation of increasingly desperate and extremely angry people who are crying out for a leader to introduce them, for the first time in their history, to real democracy.

Copy to:
Fergal Keane
All political parties

Fergal Keane: Living in a bubble of denial

RTE journalist Fergal Keane ‘enlightened’ the nation as to why Irish people did not resort to rioting in response to the economic collapse (Drivetime, 13 Dec.).

He gave two reasons:

One: Irish people know the consequences of political violence; we’ve lived with it for 40 years or more.

Two: A collective sense of guilt. Everybody sinned in one-way or another. People took out too many loans; they bought stuff they shouldn’t have bought. Everybody felt responsible so we all took responsibility for it.

Keane could not be more wrong in his assessment and his ignorance reflects a disturbing lack of awareness within the media in general but particularly within RTE of the reality of how Ireland is really governed.

Let’s take the political violence argument first.

Keane, along with a great deal of Irish journalists, politicians and other commentators, has this bizarre idea in his head that, somehow, political violence in Ireland is special.

So, the death of an Irish citizen by bomb or bullet is infinitely more painful, more horrifying than the violent death of a citizen in Iraq or Afghanistan.

I remember a few years ago Ryan Tubridy losing the run of himself during an interview with a victim of the Northern Ireland conflict.

I’m so impressed with your courage; your suffering is surely the worst in history. (Or words to that effect).

I could almost hear the gears grinding in Tubridy’s head:

A bit over the top Ryan, what about World War One and Two, what about the Holocaust, the Inquisition, the countless billions of others who suffered and died in wars?

He eventually spluttered: Of course that’s not to take away from others who have suffered throughout history.

Leaving aside for the moment the absolute horror and loss personally suffered by the victims of the NI conflict it was, in reality, a dirty little war fought over a long, long, thirty years with a tiny death rate (about 3,000) in comparison to over half a million and counting in Iraq, 100,000 and counting in Syria which includes the death of nearly 7,000 children and over 4,000 women.

As for those of us in the Republic, there was no war, no suffering apart from some bombings and shootings which, while horrifying for those involved, did not have any substantial affect on the lives of the general public.

This apparent widespread idea that political violence in Ireland (1916, Civil War, NI conflict and all the rest) sets the Irish above the rest of the world in terms of political violence and suffering is part of the delusion that allows journalists and others to live in a bubble of denial.

And it is from inside that bubble of denial that Keane formed his second reason as to why Irish citizens are so docile in the face of the ongoing economic catastrophe.

I’ll come back to this in my next article.

Copy to:
Fergal Keane

Bryan Dobson: RTE replies

RTE have replied to my complaint regarding the Bryan Dobson ‘idiot’ incident.

Good Evening,

Your complaint regarding Wednesday’s Six One News has been forwarded to me as Managing Editor of Television News.

Let me start by saying that we take all complaints very seriously, and that you were not alone in contacting us. Your complaint has been discussed with the editorial team and with Bryan Dobson.

As you know, Bryan Dobson was interviewing the Economist Ronan Lyons outside Government for the programme when a number of protesters walked into shot behind him during live transmission and began moving about.

The studio team believed the result was very distracting and made the interview difficult to follow for the audience.

RTÉ is also obliged to consider the welfare of the guest/correspondent and cameraman in situations like this.

A decision was taken to conclude the interview earlier than planned and Bryan Dobson communicated this.

He then made an off the cuff remark caused by the frustration of having to cut the interview short.

Bryan’s remark was solely about the interruption to the live broadcast and was not in any way a reference to the subject of the protest, or the right of people generally to protest.

RTÉ was not in any way trying to muzzle protest by pulling out of the broadcast early.

Bryan’s Dobson’s comment came in the heat of the moment but RTÉ accepts it would be better if the remark had not been made.

Best regards, and many thanks for viewing our programmes.

I’m not entirely happy with this reply and will therefore forward my complaint to the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland for further consideration.

My reply to RTE

Dear …

Your comments on the Bryan Dobson incident were interesting but, unfortunately, did not address the substance of my complaint.

My submission focused entirely on the belief that Bryan Dobson was in breach of sections 21 and 22 of the Code of Fairness, Objectivity and Impartiality in News and Current Affairs which specifically debars Irish broadcasters from expressing a personal opinion on air.

I will forward my complaint to the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland for further consideration.

Thank You

Anthony Sheridan

Bryan Dobson: Formal complaint

Under draconian legislation introduced this year Irish broadcasters are strictly forbidden from expressing an opinion on air.

Clearly Bryan Dobson expressed an opinion when he referred to protesters as idiots.

I have submitted the following complaint to RTE.

To Whom It May Concern:

I wish to lodge a formal complaint against RTE news presenter Bryan Dobson for a breach of sections 21 and 22 of the Code of Fairness, Objectivity and Impartiality in News and Current Affairs which came into effect on 1 July 2013 under Section 42 of the Broadcasting Act 2009.

Under this code Irish broadcasters are specifically forbidden from expressing an opinion on air.

On Six One News of 27 November last, while interviewing economist Ronan Lyons, Mr. Dobson expressed a very strong opinion regarding protesters who had gathered behind Mr. Lyons.

Mr. Dobson said:

I’m going to stop that there because the idiots behind you are a bit of a distraction so we will try to get rid of those and get back to you.

Clearly Mr. Dobson had formed and expressed an opinion that the protesters were idiots.

That Mr. Dobson expressed an opinion in breach of the Code is further corroborated by his subsequent actions.

He made an immediate and independent editorial decision to terminate the interview based on his opinion that the ‘idiot’ protesters were a distraction.

He expressed an intention to ‘get rid of’ the idiots before resuming the interview at a later time.

Yours sincerely
Anthony Sheridan

Bryan Dobson: Respect for idiot politicians but not for peaceful protesters

The reaction of RTEs Bryan Dobson to the arrival of protesters during a live interview is very revealing of RTEs attitude to those who dare to question the authority of the State.

It wasn’t the actions of the protesters that so annoyed Mr. Dobson. It wasn’t that they were jumping up and down shouting slogans and insults.

It wasn’t that they were interfering with the interviewee or the RTE crew, as Mr. Dobson later claimed.

Indeed the protesters were a model of decorum; they merely placed themselves behind Mr. Lyons in order to take advantage of a media event to quietly and peacefully express an opinion.

Such protests are very common in all functional democracies.

No, it seems it was the mere fact that the protesters were present at all that so annoyed Mr. Dobson.

Dobson’s extraordinary reaction can be reasonably compared to state controlled media in non-democratic states like Communist China.

He made an immediate and independent editorial decision to terminate the interview based on his opinion that the protesters were a distraction.

He expressed an intention to ‘get rid of’ the protesters before resuming the interview at a later time.

I suspect that Dobson was personally upset to see one of the protesters disrespecting our ‘Great Leader’, Enda Kenny, by using his photograph as part of the protest.

It’s typical that Dobson has no tolerance for ‘idiot’ protesters but seems to have endless tolerance and respect for idiot politicians as evidenced by his warm and cuddly interview with a previous ‘Great Leader’, Bertie Ahern.

George Hook: Please, don't make me face the past

George Hook is not impressed by Sinn Fein’s call for a proper banking inquiry after the party announced it had anonymously received a further batch of Anglo Irish Bank tapes (The Right Hook, 6 Nov).

I don’t want to know what happened in the past. I want to know what happens to my grandchildren’s future, will they get a job and I think that is what we have to be looking and seriously considering now.

People operating under this uniquely Irish form of delusion think that if everybody agrees to forget the past then everything will be rosy in the future.

In functional democracies the common mindset understands that the past must first be dealt with, no matter how distasteful, so that the future can be better for everyone.

Is the DPP warning Michael Smith and Village magazine?

The Director of Public Prosecutions, Claire Loftus, has just published her annual report.

In the Foreword she issued the following warning to the media.

I want to take this opportunity to say something generally about the risks of pre-trial publicity interfering with the right of an accused person to a fair trial.

The media and commentators have a high degree of responsibility to ensure that not only do they not commit a contempt of court by publishing or broadcasting prejudicial material but also that such publicity is not the cause of a trial being postponed for a long period, or even indefinitely.

These risks increase as any trial date approaches.

Could it be that her warning is aimed at the editor of Village magazine, Michael Smith, who issued the following challenge to Ms. Loftus and her office in the August/September issue?

Dear Ms. Loftus,

The whole country wants you to prosecute possible offences arising out of the planning and payments tribunals and banking collapses, which have devastated this country and disenfranchised a generation.

Democracy depends on the prosecutability of alleged white-collar crime.

If you do not initiate prosecutions of UniCredit Bank Ireland, John Bowe (formerly of Irish Anglo Bank), Michael Fingleton (formerly of INBS), Michael Lowry TD and allegedly ‘corrupt’ former Monarch Properties executives as a start, Village will itself generate prosecutions in early September.

Yours sincerely,

The Editor and Directors of Village magazine.

The citizens of Ireland owe a debt of gratitude to people like Michael Smith for their courage in challenging the might of a state that has for decades refused to act against the disease of white-collar and political corruption.