The Department's answer will tell the tale

This afternoon I received a return call from one of the members of the Passport Review Committee at the Department of Foreign Affairs.

The Committee recently decided to retain the special passport facility for Oireachtas members. This is an exclusive service provided by the Passport Office for politicians who are anxious to do favours for their constituents.

My question is simple: If the Committee, the Department, the Minister, every TD, every Senator and every political party is happy with this facility, if it is seen as adding to the efficiency of the passport office as stated in the Committee’s report – why isn’t the facility advertised in the department’s literature and posted on its website?

The Committee member said she would consult with her colleagues and get back to me within a few days.

If the politicians and civil servants genuinely believe that this service is needed then there should be no problem in telling every citizen of its existence.

If, as I believe, it is part of a huge network of ‘facilities’ provided to politicians to do favours for their constituents then the State will be anxious to minimise publicity.

The Department’s answer to my question will tell the tale.

Justice and Dr. Neary

A caller to Today with Pat Kenny asked if Dr. Neary was ever prosecuted for the horrors he committed on women in Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital.

Of course Dr. Neary was never prosecuted, that sort of thing doesn’t happen in Ireland. Instead, he was given a €70,000 pension and sent on his way.

What do those women expect in a corrupt state – accountability, justice?

One for everyone in the audience

For a brief moment I was fooled by the headline – “Taoiseach to scrap his ‘Big Brother’ media monitoring unit.”

This is the special unit set up by Fianna Fail in 1997 to monitor the media and report back to ministers about what was being written and said about them on the airwaves. Pat Rabbitte got it about right:

“A Fianna Fail espionage unit funded by the taxpayer to monitor what its political opponents are saying about Fianna Fail.”

It’s the sort of operation that’s common in all corrupt states. Up until now I thought that there was only one such unit but apparently there’s one in every department – One for everyone in the audience as it were.

Now, as part of a cost-cutting exercise, the unit is to be privatised and not scrapped as the headlines suggests. Let’s try to figure out how this will save taxpayer’s money.

No civil servant will lose his job or be demoted in any manner whatsoever so no cost saving there. And if we are to judge from countless instances in the past the setting up and running costs of the new office will be enormous.

So, yet another layer of (very expensive) bureaucracy is being created in order to save money??

Questions but no answers

For about two weeks now I’ve been ringing the Department of Foreign Affairs to ask questions about the special passport facility for members of the Oireachtas.

So far I’ve received no answers. This morning I rang the General Secretary of the Department, Dermot Gallagher, but as usual he was at a meeting. Here’s a flavour of my conversation with one of his ‘protectors’.

Could you tell me when the meeting is due to end?
Early afternoon
Could you be more specific?
Early afternoon
Before one O’Clock?
Early afternoon
Will he be going to lunch?
I can only say early afternoon

I informed the ‘protector’ that I would continue to ring until contact was made and asked what time Mr. Gallagher started work in the morning.

What time does Mr. Gallagher start work in the morning?
That depends on his first meeting
He doesn’t have a set time for beginning work?
I didn’t say that
But you said it depends on his first meeting
It does
So he doesn’t have a set time for beginning work
I didn’t say that

Time for a cup of tea, I think

Second Lisbon Treaty referendum? – Definitely

There’s a lot of talk going on about the possibility of holding a second Lisbon Treaty referendum. Here’s my penny’s worth.

There will definitely be another referendum. The Government has only to decide on strategy. It’s unlikely they’ll opt for the mad ‘fancy legal footwork’ idea suggested by Irish Times columnist Stephen Collins.

Two prongs of their strategy will be:

The demonisation of key figures on the anti treaty side and in particular Ganley and McEvaddy.

The central plank of the Government’s campaign will not be on the treaty per se but will focus on frightening Irish voters into thinking that a No vote will mean being thrown out of the EU.

National Lottery suspicions

The National Lottery has a new game called Millionaire Raffle. Tickets cost €20 each and the game is limited to 300,000 players. There are 532 prizes, the first two are for €1million; the next five pay €100,000 and prizes range downwards after that.

The first draw took place during the Rose of Tralee Festival last Tuesday but players are not at all happy with the manner in which the whole thing was organised.

Most of these 300,000 people tuned in to the show in the expectation of watching a live draw in which all their dreams might come true. Alas, it was not to be. The draw had actually taken place earlier that day, behind closed doors, at the National Lottery HQ in Dublin.

Photographers were dispatched to all the winning agents where photographs were taken and emailed to Tralee in preparation for the ‘live’ draw later that night. The ‘live’ draw turned out to be just the live ‘announcement’ of the winners.

Slick, efficient, great for RTE and the National Lottery but many callers into Liveline (Wed) were very suspicious of the whole deal. Derrick Davis said people thought there were victims of a three card trick. Many also expressed amazement that one of the €1million winners just happened to live in Tralee.

The whole episode has echoes of the National Sweepstakes operation of which I wrote about recently and the common denominator is state involvement and control. The corrupt Sweepstake, which for decades robbed countless millions from Irish citizens, was set up and run by the State, even the draws were supervised by a Garda Commissioner.

Consider the similarities with the National Lottery. RTE is a State organisation that practically acts as the promotional wing of the National Lottery. Curiously, a spokesperson for the Lottery didn’t know what financial arrangements existed between the NL and RTE for the Rose of Tralee.

The Dept. of Finance ‘regulates’ the activities of the NL, I wonder what arrangements are in place here. The State’s police are still involved with a Garda drawing tickets every week in company with a representative from KPMG. And most significantly, it’s a government minister (Martin Cullen, I think) who decides who benefits from lottery funds.

So, the State broadcaster, two government departments, the police force and an individual minister, all running or involved in the National Lottery. Sure, who could be suspicious of that?

The report that isn't a report

The report on the review of the special passport facility for Oireachtas Members was published on the website of the Department of Foreign Affairs two weeks ago.

I was therefore surprised by the reaction I received from the DFA press office when I phoned yesterday to ask some questions regarding the report.

“The report is in the final stages of being finalised. Some of the key people who were involved putting the report together are currently out of the office so we don’t expect the final report to be signed off until the very end of this month or into early September, So, I’m afraid we are unable to answer question until that has taken place.”

But, says I, the report is finished and published – it’s on your website.

“No, the report isn’t published.”

I indicated to the spokesperson where, on their website, the report is published and, after a long silence, he replied.

“This isn’t the report; this is a report on the review itself but the review itself hasn’t been published. This is just updating to where it is, where we currently are on this but it isn’t the actual final report, this is a report on the review, it’s not the review. Do you follow me?”

He rang back later and we talked about the report but, not unexpectedly, he was unable to answer any of my questions.

So, what's new?

Actor and broadcaster Joe Taylor was on the Marian Finucane Show last Saturday talking about his most memorable radio and television moments.

Here’s an edited account of what he had to say about the Irish Hospitals Sweepstakes.

The Irish Hospitals Sweepstakes was set up in the 1930s with the intention of providing Irish hospitals with funds to develop proper facilities. The whole set up was very impressive and was operated under the watchful eye of the Garda Commissioner

When I discovered actually what was taking place behind the scenes at the Irish Hospitals Sweepstakes I thought ‘oh my god, were we ever suckered into a feeling of delusion.

It was Mark Twain who said you can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. The sweeps fooled all of the people for practically all of the time – for 57 years.

If a quarter of the money that was raised through the sale of tickets illegally in America and Canada, because gambling was banned in both these countries, Prof Drumm and Mary Harney would be carried around the country today for having the best hospital service in the entire world.

But the money sort of disappeared; it was taken up in administration and so on. At one stage the mafia in the late 30s tried to muscle in on the Sweepstakes in America and the Sweeps sent over a couple of IRA men and also they had the ear of American cops and so the Mafia backed down and there was no more interference.

Then in 1947 the Mexican government decided they would try to sell tickets into America. The Mexicans were delighted when the Irish offered to supply them with consultants to help them but soon realised that they were being ripped off when all the money started to go back to Ireland.

So, let’s just review the main points.

1930s Ireland and the health services were of a Third World standard. A scheme to generate funds was set up by the Government and overseen by the number one policeman in the country. The scheme was corrupt from day one and everybody in power knew about it but did nothing.

When another corrupt organisation tried to take some of the action they were threatened with violence. When another country tried to set up the same scam they were ripped off by the Irish.

Very little money was actually spent on health services so Irish citizens continued to suffer and die needlessly because of greed and corruption.

Ireland still has a Third World health service; people are still suffering and dying because of incompetence and corruption and practically all of the people are still allowing themselves to be fooled.

So, what’s new?

Irish civil servants – Always an experience

I rang the Passport Office this morning with a number of questions regarding the report on the special passport facility for Oireachtas members.

The person I’ve dealt with over the last number of months was on holiday so I was put onto Nora who knows absolutely nothing about the case or the review report.

I asked to speak to the civil servant who emailed me the report on Friday and was told she’s ‘somewhere in Dublin’ but they would get her to ring me back.

It’s always an experience talking to Irish civil servants.

Shock -Tammany Hall passport scheme to be retained

At last the review of the special passport facility for politicians has been completed. The Passport Office was good enough to email me the report last Friday. It comes as no great shock to read that the committee has recommended that the facility be retained.

“The Committee recommends that the special facility for passport applications forwarded by Members of the Oireachtas should be retained.”

Every member of the Oireachtas was asked for their views on the matter; sixty two written replies were received. Again, it comes as no great shock that all those who replied were in favour of retaining the facility – Turkey’s do not vote for Christmas.

Now that the politicians have decided to retain their Tammany Hall scheme Public Inquiry will be working to have the facility fully publicised, including a mention on the Passport Office website, so that all members of the public can equally avail of this service provided by their public representatives.

The report is short so I have reproduced it in full below.

Report on the Review of the Special Passport Facility for Oireachtas Members

Background

1. In response to a series of Parliamentary Questions earlier this year, regarding the existing provision of a special passport facility for Members of the Oireachtas, the then Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr. Dermot Ahern, TD, indicated that he had asked the Secretary General of his Department, Mr. Dermot Gallagher, to review all aspects of the arrangement, including whether it should be continued.

2. The Minister also indicated that the views of Members of the Oireachtas should be sought on the issue during the course of the review.

The Present System

3. The Department of Foreign Affairs has always over the years sought to be of assistance to Members of the Oireachtas, given their role as elected representatives, in relation to facilitating passport applications. This assistance was put on a more structured basis in the mid 1990s, with the introduction of a special facility in Leinster House allowing for applications to be forwarded through TDs’ and Senators’ offices.

4. Under this system, passport applications are collected in Leinster House by a Service Officer from the Department. The applications are then processed by a small unit of the Passport Office in Molesworth Street. Completed passports are returned to Leinster House by the Departmental Service Officer, or on occasion they may be posted directly to the applicant, if so requested.

5. The applications are examined for entitlement in precisely the same manner as all other applications. They are also subject to exactly the same fees, including the payment of an additional fee where a passport is required within 48 hours. Likewise, proof of travel is required for applications routed through the special facility where the passport is requested for issue in less than 5 days.

6. Precise levels of usage of the passport facility prior to 2008 are difficult to provide. The primary focus of the unit processing these applications was, understandably, on ensuring the entitlement of applicants to passports. Details of submitting Members and/or their Offices were at the time a secondary consideration. The unit retained manual records of applications received, primarily to permit follow-up in the event of any queries. However, the content of these records is rather poor, with the applications often recorded under the names of contact points in Members’ offices.

7. Under a revised system introduced on 18 February 2008, details of all applications received through the facility are recorded electronically. This permits a more precise monitoring of usage of the facility. An analysis of our records show that in a four month period from February to June 2008, applications routed though the facility accounted for less than one per cent of all applications.

8. In addition to the applications which are forwarded by TDs and Senators, the unit processes applications forwarded by some offices of the Health Service Executive. The majority of these applications concern children in care. Included at times over the years also have been applications from the Health Boards, An Garda Síochána, the Defence Forces, and NGOs working in developing countries.

Review Process

9. In pursuit of the mandate given to him, Secretary General Gallagher established a Departmental Committee consisting of officials with particular knowledge and experience in the passport area and good administrative practice. A list of the Committee members is at Appendix 1.

10. At the beginning of the process, Minister Ahern had written to all Members of the Oireachtas seeking their views on the issue and inviting them to respond directly to the Committee. Sixty two written replies were received, all of which were in favour of retaining the facility.

11. In addition, the former Minister had written to the Leaders of political parties in the Oireachtas inviting them to nominate a contact person or persons to discuss the issue with a sub-group of the Committee. The Leaders of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Labour Party responded and nominated representatives. At subsequent (separate) discussions, the representatives of the three Leaders conveyed a clear desire for the continuation of the facility.

12. The Committee also sought to ascertain if analogous facilities were provided for Parliamentarians in some other countries. As a result, the Committee ascertained that, in Britain for example, the Passport Service provides a dedicated MP hotline number, which MPs can use to contact the passport office on behalf of constituents with immediate passport problems, or to request priority appointments if they themselves are travelling on parliamentary business. In Washington, the Committee ascertained that there is a Special Issuance Agency, which is a separate office within the passport system, whose mandate is to serve the travel needs of officials, including expediting the issuing of passports.

Overview and Recommendation

13. In the experience of the Department, requests to elected representatives usually arise because a passport is required at short notice or because an applicant has encountered some difficulty with the application process. The Department, as said, has always sought to be of assistance to Members in this regard.

14. From an operational perspective, the Department believes that it is more efficient for such applications and queries to be routed through a special facility and a specific unit. This ensures a prompt response and avoids any disruption to the processing of applications by other sections of the Passport Office. It ensures also that the need for formal political representations, including parliamentary questions, on individual applications is all but eliminated, thereby saving on the time of staff.

15. From the Department, the Passport Office and Oireachtas Members’ viewpoints, the system is clearly working efficiently and satisfactorily, and the Committee attaches particular importance to this.

16. Inevitably, cases arise where a citizen requires a passport urgently or needs assistance with his or her application. The Passport Office staff is very pleased to assist such applicants. Some applicants will however, as is their right, seek assistance from their elected representatives and it is appropriate that, within agreed parameters, there is provision for dealing with such requests. Channelling requests and applications through a specific unit ensures that they can be processed quickly and efficiently and avoids any disruption to the passport service generally. As stated above, all applications are also subject to the same rigorous process of assessment for entitlement and accuracy.

17. While accepting that the present system was working satisfactory, the Committee were of the view that an additional requirement should be introduced which would see the Oireachtas Member, or a designated member of his/her staff, certifying the need for an application to be routed through the special facility. The Committee would envisage this being implemented through the completion of a short form which would accompany each application. The envisaged form is attached at Appendix 2. This process would also facilitate the keeping of records by the Passport Office, both in terms of follow-up to queries and in compiling and tracking levels of usage.

18. The Committee would wish to note that both the Oireachtas Members who responded to it, and also the representatives of those Party Leaders who met the Sub-Committee, were supportive of this additional measure. On this basis, and in the light of the Department’s respect for the role of Oireachtas Members, and the fact that the system to date has been operating efficiently and to the satisfaction of all involved, the Committee recommends that the special facility for passport applications forwarded by Members of the Oireachtas should be retained, with the introduction of the certificate mentioned in paragraph 17.

16 July 2008