Sheep worrying takes precedence over democratic accountability

Independent TD, Stephen Donnelly, has an article in today’s Sunday Independent which proves just how undemocratic our country has become.

Michael Noonan’s promissory note announcement this week was a stark example of how toothless an institution the Dail has become.

This is bad for democracy, and bodes ill for our economic and social recovery.

At 4pm on Thursday, Michael Noonan walked into the Dail and announced a new deal on the imminent payment of €3.1bn to the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (formerly Anglo and Irish Nationwide).

He read out his page and a half, refused to answer any questions, and left.

I and other TDs urgently requested time to ask a few questions but were informed that the house must proceed with ‘topical issues’.

This is time dedicated to discussing the most critical national issues of a given day.

It was introduced by the new Government to make the Dail more relevant, more connected to reality.

The following 10-minute debate was given over to the problem of sheep worrying by ramblers.

You are not reading a Father Ted script. That’s what actually happened.

Does anyone see any hope whatsoever?

Cormac Lucey: Still not in the big picture

I received the following comments from Cormac Lucey in response to my recent article on the fallout from the Mahon Tribunal Report.

My response to Mr. Lucy follows below.

I’m sorry that you were disappointed by my piece. Nowhere do I suggest that Bertie is “innocent of everything that happened”.

There is no doubt that those in government at the time must accept political responsibility for what happened to the economy on their watch.

But they got precious little help from “the experts” as this piece, which I wrote a year, attempts to demonstrate.

I would argue that Bertie didn’t deserve the adulation he enjoyed at the height of his powers. But nor does he deserve the opprobrium he “enjoys” today.

The same bodies which assured Bertie’s government that everything was OK in 2007 are today reassuring Enda’s government that our debts are sustainable.

We should look behind the pantomime villains which politics throws up and examine carefully the vested interests which endure long after “the villains” have left the stage to be replaced by new pantomime figures.

Unfortunately, Mr. Lucy, the pantomime villains you speak of hold positions of power where they can do pretty much as they like.

In almost all cases they put themselves, their party, the continuation of power for as long as possible and, of course, the behind the scenes vested interests before the country or its people.

They can do pretty much as they like because our administrative system- legal, public/civil service, law enforcement, regulatory agencies etc. do not operate like those in functional democracies.

In almost all cases these so called authorities go to great lengths to protect those guilty of corrupt practices and in many cases are themselves complicit in corruption.

At any time in the last thirty or so years politicians could have prevented the banks from routinely robbing their customers, could have allowed so called regulatory agencies to actually regulate rather than protecting the thieves, could have thrown their corrupt fellow politicians in jail.

They chose not to do any of this. As we can see from the (non) response to the Mahon Tribunal Report, they are still choosing not to do this.

Furthermore, many in the media seem to be completely blind to the big picture which is right in front of them.

Ireland is an intrinsically corrupt state. It is different from all other Western democracies in that it refuses to act against corrupt politicians or white- collar crime in general.

Anyone who doubts what I say need only ask themselves the following simple questions.

If a Mahon Tribunal type report were published in a functional democracy would there have been arrests by now?

The answer is, of course, a resounding yes.

Why, then, have there been no arrests in Ireland?

Because state authorities, including the body politic, put the preservation of their corrupt system before the good of the country or its people.

The evidence for this is overwhelming and obvious to anyone looking at the situation with a completely objective mind.

The article you wrote in 2011 deals with some reasons for the economic collapse in 2008. While the collapse of the economy is a catastrophic event it is only a (an inevitable) symptom of a corrupt political/administrative system.

Political/administrative/business corruption is the big picture. This is where the power lies and ordinary citizens are completely powerless to do anything about it – to date.

Bertie Ahern does deserve the opprobrium he’s getting. It’s an absolute minimum ‘punishment’ for what he has done to Ireland and its people.

I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that if this low-grade politician did what he did in a functional democracy he would now be in jail.

As a victim citizen of a corrupt state I can say with absolute certainty that neither Ahern nor any of those named in the report will be brought to justice.

That fact alone confirms that Ireland is an intrinsically corrupt state.

Copy to;
Cormac Lucey

Corruption is endemic

The following quote is from an editorial in yesterday’s Irish Times.

In truth, the vast majority of politicians are people of integrity, motivated by a sense of civic duty and a commitment to public service. Corruption in Ireland is not rife.

Wrong; Corruption is rife at every level of Irish society and in particular, as reported by Mahon, it is endemic within the political system.

Furthermore the vast majority of politicians operate very comfortably within the corrupt political/administrative system.

Politicians comfortable within a corrupt political/administrative system

Deputy leader of Sinn Fein Mary Lou McDonald was not pleased when Pat Kenny said the nation was scandalised over the Inkgate incident (Frontline, 5th March).

To say the nation is scandalised is blowing things out of proportion.

That Ms. McDonald seems blind to the deep anger generated by this latest rip off of taxpayers hard earned money indicates that she and her party are more in tune with the corrupt political/administrative system than the radical reform ideals they constantly proclaim.

Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Pat Rabbitte is another politician who seems very comfortable operating within our corrupt political/administrative system.

The implications of the new standing charge for low-use electricity customers were ‘not earth-shattering‘ according to Minister Rabbitte.

He was responding to the move by ESB Electric Ireland to hit more than 100,000 domestic electricity customers with a 50 per cent increase in their standing charge if they use an average of two units or less per day from February 1st.

Minister Rabbitte has suggested that the new charge is aimed at (by definition, relatively wealthy) holiday cottage owners (100,000 of them?) rather than a scam to rip off the most vulnerable in society.

Independent TD Luke ‘Ming’ Flanagan is yet another politician who has settled very easily into our corrupt political/administrative system.

Just after he was elected Mr. Flanagan said he would donate half of his €92,000 salary to fund projects in his community.

One year on from his promise Mr. Flanagan has refused point blank to give even a broad outline of where his alleged donations have gone.

I decided to donate on the basis of guaranteed anonymity. The alternative is that I get community groups complaining that one group was favoured over the other.

In a functional democracy this silly excuse would be greeted with hilarity and even deep skepticism.

In a deeply corrupt state like Ireland, where barefaced lying is the norm among the political class it is simply unbelievable.

I don’t believe for a moment that any of the above politicians are corrupt in any way but they do operate within a deeply corrupt political/administrative system and must, like almost every other state official, react to that system as circumstances and their own particular personal/political interests dictate.

Whether that’s denial, lying or arrogant dismissal doesn’t matter a great deal.

In the end all such reactions do serious damage to Ireland and its people.

Copy to:
Mary Lou McDonald
Pat Rabbitte
Luke ‘Ming’ Flanagan

O Snodaigh scandal confirms Sinn Fein as just another party operating within a corrupt political/administrative system

The abuse of public funds by Sinn Fein’s Aengus O Snodaigh to the tune of €50,000 is no big deal financially speaking.

Politicians have been plundering public funds for decades and that situation is unlikely to change until the corrupt political/administrative system is totally dismantled.

The incident is important, however, in that it confirms that Sinn Fein is not the radical party it has always claimed to be.

The reaction by Gerry Adams, Mary Lou McDonald and O Snodaigh himself places their party firmly within the main stream body politic sphere of get what you can out of the system while the going is good.

It was excessive but, we’re told, he broke no law, he did nothing wrong.

These words have confirmed (and condemned) Sinn Fein as a fully signed up member of an irredeemably corrupt political/administrative system.

If Sinn Fein was the radical party they have always claimed to be they would never even have engaged with the rotten system in the first place. If they were truly revolutionary they would have refused to take their Dail seats.

Instead, they would have stood outside the gates of Dail Eireann, with the people, and stayed there until the disease of corruption had been excised from the body politic.

This incident, and the reaction to it, also puts paid to any hope that the party might reform the rotten system from the inside.

It’s doubtful that Sinn Fein, in common with all other parties, is even aware of how corrupt the political/administrative system really is.

Sinn Fein’s rising popularity in recent years, I believe, is a desperate plea from ordinary Irish citizens for real accountability and transparency from a courageous and visionary political party.

This incident and the cynical/dishonest reaction to it have dashed any hopes that Sinn Fein is the party with the courage and vision to root out the disease of corruption from Irish public life.

Copy to:
Sinn Feinn

Senator Bacik: Principles in deep freeze

The concept of maintaining core principles in the transition from opposition to power is completely foreign to the vast majority of Irish politicians.

Here’s Labour Senator Ivana Bacik commenting on a number of issues on Newstalk yesterday.

On government advisors:

I wouldn’t have been a huge defender of advisors until I see first hand how important it is for ministers to have people who are politically alongside.

On breaching pay caps for government advisors:

I think it’s difficult, I think also that ministers would have people who are advisors who’ve got experience, who’ve got ability but, you know, I’m not defending…interrupted.

On Minister Quinn’s expenses claims:

I heard Minister Ruari Quinn on the radio during the week robustly defending it and saying that other’s are using the car, there’s officials using it.

So I must say having known Ruari Quinn for a long time I think he’s a politician of great integrity. I find it hard to believe there’s anything in this story. No, it’s nothing.

On reform of the expenses system:

It’s all being looked at, there’s a committee in Leinster House looking at that. There’s ongoing reform of the system generally.

At first sight this might sound like pure, unadulterated Fianna Fail speak but in reality it’s the voice of any Irish politician operating within the principles free zone of power.

This principles free zone has just one law:

When in power put all principles that may in any way damage the maintenance of that power into deep freeze.

Principles may be unfrozen and cynically used again only when safely in opposition.

Copy to:

Ivana Bacik

Eamon Gilmore: Profit more important than human rights?

Every country trading or hoping to trade with China has to achieve a balance between profit and defending human rights by highlighting China’s poor record in this area.

Most Western countries have made efforts to achieve this balance.

The French Prime Minister recently spoke out strongly during a visit to China.

US president Barak Obama also spoke directly to the Chinese and had an official make the following statement outside the Beijing courthouse where a human rights campaigner was being sentenced.

We call on the Government of China to release him immediately and to respect the rights of all China’s citizens to peacefully express their political views.

Many of these people are tortured and in one case the wife and children of a campaigner were starved for three days until he relented.

Amnesty International asked our Minister for Foreign Affairs, Eamon Gilmore, to specifically raise some of these cases with the Chinese Vice President on his recent visit.

Gilmore’s response:

No, we didn’t raise specific cases any more than we raised specific trade investments.

Trade investments, human torture? What’s the difference, what’s the big deal?

In fairness to Gilmore, he’s only reflecting the extremely low ethical/moral standards common throughout the Irish body politic.

Full report on RTEs Drivetime (20th Feb.).

Copy to:
Eamon Gilmore

Religious dinosaur (Senator Hanafin) emerges from the undergrowth

Atheist Ireland has written to all members of the respective Committees on Procedure and Privilege of both the Dail and the Seanad requesting that the Oireachtas cease the practice of starting daily business with a prayer.

The letter quotes the opinion of Senator John Hanafin from 2007.

I welcome that we pray every morning in the Chamber before conducting our business. It allows us to renew our efforts to do our best and invoke God to assist us in our efforts.

I note societies that turned their back on God — fascist and communist — and relied solely on Man’s logic, rose and fell quickly.

Ok, I know that our body politic is full of representatives who are ignorant when it comes to history/philosophy but it’s rare enough these days to see such dinosaurs actually emerge from the undergrowth.

Enday Kenny: Nothing free anymore (Except for politicians)

Enda Kenny was on the news the other day telling us that the €100 property tax was needed for street lighting, footpaths and libraries. He topped this dishonest argument by saying:

There’s nothing free in this world anymore.

This, of course, is not true either.

The annual top-up of almost €50,000 he received as leader of the Opposition was free and the €17,205 Jan O’Sullivan is pocketing on top of her minister’s salary of €130,042 is also free.

John Waters: Blind to the brutal reality of white-collar corruption in Ireland

Recently, Irish Times columnist, John Waters, did a really, really, stupid thing.

Writing in the Irish Mail on Sunday (January 22) Mr. Waters describes how he was browsing the Web when he was confronted with a pop-up competition, which, he writes ‘I was impelled to engage with’.

After clicking on a proffered answer to a quiz question Waters was invited to submit his mobile phone number which, and this is where the stupidity comes in, he did.

Immediately Waters was sucked into the murky, unregulated underworld of mobile phone rip-offs that ultimately cost him up to €200.

Now it might be argued that this could happen to anybody, indeed, it obviously happens to lots of people which is why most, if not all, phone companies are engaged in these sleazy practices.

But waters was doubly stupid because five years previously his daughter was the victim of a very similar rip-off.

She had texted her number to a TV advert which allowed criminals (Waters’ word) to steal over €150 from her account.

Waters eventually managed to get his daughters money refunded but only after a great deal of hassle and stress dealing with organisations like the offending phone company, Comreg, Regtel and the Department of Communications.

Here’s how he described the situation:

I discovered that this practice was widespread. So-called ‘premium-rater’ telephone companies were seemingly able to take money from someone’s mobile phone account with total impunity, even though no service had ever been requested and none supplied.

On top of this stupidity Waters goes on (unwittingly) to admit that he is extremely naïve and disturbingly ignorant (especially for a journalist) when it comes to his knowledge of how things are done in the (corrupt) state of Ireland.

Apparently Waters is one of those people who labour under the delusion that Irish regulators are there to serve the interests of the people, to make sure that citizens are protected against the ruthless activities of white-collar criminals.

On the off chance that Mr. Waters may at some point read this article I feel impelled to spell out the brutal reality.

So-called regulators, at best, consist of comfortable freeloaders, almost always appointed by politicians, who are expert only in drawing down their lottery sum salaries and expenses while regurgitating the same glossy annual report, which invariably paints a picture of absolute happiness across the land.

They exist for only one reason – to create the pretence that Ireland is a functional, well-regulated democracy.

These so-called regulators have just two priorities.

To do as their political masters instruct and to become expert in waffling to the general public about the great job they’re doing.

At worst, so-called regulators actively work to protect and indeed facilitate white- collar criminals no matter what the crime, no matter how much damage is inflicted on Ireland and its people.

How can I make such a statement with such confidence? Simple, I just look at the record, over, say the last thirty years, of endemic white-collar crime.

How many so-called regulators have independently uncovered white-collar crime in the last thirty years – None.

How many prosecutions have been taken by so-called regulators against white-collar criminals in the last thirty years – Very, very few.

How many white-collar criminals have been jailed in the last thirty years – Very, very few.

How many major white-collar criminals have been prosecuted and/or jailed over the last thirty years – None, absolutely none.

The most disturbing aspect of Mr. Waters’ article is his total ignorance of the depth of corruption in Ireland. The headline on his article reads:

Since when is larceny not just legal but admirable?

I can answer that question very precisely.

Larceny of the white-collar variety became legal and admired in December 1979 when John Waters’ hero, the criminal politician Haughey, came to power.

It was at that ignominious moment that Ireland and its people began the catastrophic slide into poverty and loss of sovereignty, a situation that will destroy the lives of Irish citizens for generations to come.

It is a genuine tragedy for Ireland that influential people like Mr. Waters are unable or are unwilling to accept the brutal reality that Ireland is an intrinsically corrupt state.

It is worth quoting the final few chapters of Mr. Waters’ article because it sums up his ignorance of the reality that our political system is corrupt and that the rotten system has spread the disease of corruption throughout all levels of Irish society.

It is as though many people now take it as read that Ireland has become a paradise for shysters and robbers.

I must have dropped off for a few years because I have no memory of this dramatic shift in Irish culture being discussed and ushered in.

Mr. Waters is admitting that he has no memory of the very serious political and financial white-collar crime that has been endemic over the last thirty years.

I still had these old-fashioned notions that stealing was illegal and even conceivably wrong and that the State had a responsibility to protect its citizens from crooks. Silly me.

Yes Mr. Waters, silly you.

Copy to:
John Waters